mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

On the Improvement of Generalization and Stability of Forward-Only Learning via Neural Polarization

arXiv 2408.09210 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2024cs.LG cs.AI cs.NEcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Forward-only learning algorithms have recently gained attention as alternatives to gradient backpropagation, replacing the backward step of this latter solver with an additional contrastive forward pass. Among these approaches, the so-called Forward-Forward Algorithm (FFA) has been shown to achieve competitive levels of performance in terms of generalization and complexity. Networks trained using FFA learn to contrastively maximize a layer-wise defined goodness score when presented with real data (denoted as positive samples) and to minimize it when processing synthetic data (corr. negative samples). However, this algorithm still faces weaknesses that negatively affect the model accuracy and training stability, primarily due to a gradient imbalance between positive and negative samples. To overcome this issue, in this work we propose a novel implementation of the FFA algorithm, denoted as Polar-FFA, which extends the original formulation by introducing a neural division (polarization) between positive and negative instances. Neurons in each of these groups aim to maximize their goodness when presented with their respective data type, thereby creating a symmetric gradient behavior. To empirically gauge the improved learning capabilities of our proposed Polar-FFA, we perform several systematic experiments using different activation and goodness functions over image classification datasets. Our results demonstrate that Polar-FFA outperforms FFA in terms of accuracy and convergence speed. Furthermore, its lower reliance on hyperparameters reduces the need for hyperparameter tuning to guarantee optimal generalization capabilities, thereby allowing for a broader range of neural network configurations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2024.

Builds on

16 of 23 references.

References · 16

  1. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  2. 2018Deep Learning for Classical Japanese Literaturecited by 415
  3. 2022The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigationscited by 262
  4. 2022Toward Next-Generation Artificial Intelligence: Catalyzing the NeuroAI Revolutioncited by 78
  5. 2022Error-driven Input Modulation: Solving the Credit Assignment Problem without a Backward Passcited by 63
  6. 2020Local plasticity rules can learn deep representations using self-supervised contrastive predictionscited by 47
  7. 2023The Predictive Forward-Forward Algorithmcited by 35
  8. 2021SoftHebb: Bayesian Inference in Unsupervised Hebbian Soft Winner-Take-All Networkscited by 29
  9. 2023SymBa: Symmetric Backpropagation-Free Contrastive Learning with Forward-Forward Algorithm for Optimizing Convergencecited by 27
  10. 2023Forward-Forward Training of an Optical Neural Networkcited by 19
  11. 2018Error Forward-Propagation: Reusing Feedforward Connections to Propagate Errors in Deep Learningcited by 16
  12. 2023Brain-Inspired Machine Intelligence: A Survey of Neurobiologically-Plausible Credit Assignmentcited by 13
4 more
  1. 2023Emergent representations in networks trained with the Forward-Forward algorithmcited by 11
  2. 2023Contrastive-Signal-Dependent Plasticity: Self-Supervised Learning in Spiking Neural Circuitscited by 10
  3. 2023A theory for the sparsity emerged in the Forward Forward algorithmcited by 7
  4. 2023Extending the Forward Forward Algorithmcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.