PADetBench: Towards Benchmarking Physical Attacks against Object Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Physical attacks against object detection have gained increasing attention due to their significant practical implications. However, conducting physical experiments is extremely time-consuming and labor-intensive. Moreover, physical dynamics and cross-domain transformation are challenging to strictly regulate in the real world, leading to unaligned evaluation and comparison, severely hindering the development of physically robust models. To accommodate these challenges, we explore utilizing realistic simulation to thoroughly and rigorously benchmark physical attacks with fairness under controlled physical dynamics and cross-domain transformation. This resolves the problem of capturing identical adversarial images that cannot be achieved in the real world. Our benchmark includes 20 physical attack methods, 48 object detectors, comprehensive physical dynamics, and evaluation metrics. We also provide end-to-end pipelines for dataset generation, detection, evaluation, and further analysis. In addition, we perform 8064 groups of evaluation based on our benchmark, which includes both overall evaluation and further detailed ablation studies for controlled physical dynamics. Through these experiments, we provide in-depth analyses of physical attack performance and physical adversarial robustness, draw valuable observations, and discuss potential directions for future research. Codebase: https://github.com/JiaweiLian/Benchmarking_Physical_Attack
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 112 of its 153 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2024.
Builds on
112 of 153 references.
References · 112
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
- 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
- 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
- 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
38 more
- 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
- 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
- 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
- 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
- 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
- 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
- 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
- 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
- 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
- 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimationcited by 1,339
- 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
- 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,275
- 2019Objects as Pointscited by 1,172
- 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
- 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 978
- 2018Path Aggregation Network for Instance Segmentationcited by 796
- 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
- 2022Exploring Plain Vision Transformer Backbones for Object Detectioncited by 723
- 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
- 2022DAB-DETR: Dynamic Anchor Boxes are Better Queries for DETRcited by 569
- 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
- 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 528
- 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 524
- 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
- 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 508
- 2020Sparse R-CNN: End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Proposalscited by 494
- 2019Res2Net: A New Multi-scale Backbone Architecturecited by 468
- 2020ResNeSt: Split-Attention Networkscited by 445
- 2019Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 428
- 2021Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergencecited by 422
- 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 422
- 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 408
- 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
- 2019NAS-FPN: Learning Scalable Feature Pyramid Architecture for Object Detectioncited by 289
- 2022YOLOv6: A Single-Stage Object Detection Framework for Industrial Applicationscited by 273
- 2022DETRs with Collaborative Hybrid Assignments Trainingcited by 273
- 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
- 2019RepPoints: Point Set Representation for Object Detectioncited by 264
50 most cited of 112 All 112 (JSON)
Built on by
Not cited yet.