mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

PADetBench: Towards Benchmarking Physical Attacks against Object Detection

arXiv 2408.09181 ↗First posted 17 Aug 2024cs.CV cs.CR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physical attacks against object detection have gained increasing attention due to their significant practical implications. However, conducting physical experiments is extremely time-consuming and labor-intensive. Moreover, physical dynamics and cross-domain transformation are challenging to strictly regulate in the real world, leading to unaligned evaluation and comparison, severely hindering the development of physically robust models. To accommodate these challenges, we explore utilizing realistic simulation to thoroughly and rigorously benchmark physical attacks with fairness under controlled physical dynamics and cross-domain transformation. This resolves the problem of capturing identical adversarial images that cannot be achieved in the real world. Our benchmark includes 20 physical attack methods, 48 object detectors, comprehensive physical dynamics, and evaluation metrics. We also provide end-to-end pipelines for dataset generation, detection, evaluation, and further analysis. In addition, we perform 8064 groups of evaluation based on our benchmark, which includes both overall evaluation and further detailed ablation studies for controlled physical dynamics. Through these experiments, we provide in-depth analyses of physical attack performance and physical adversarial robustness, draw valuable observations, and discuss potential directions for future research. Codebase: https://github.com/JiaweiLian/Benchmarking_Physical_Attack

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 112 of its 153 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Aug 2024.

Builds on

112 of 153 references.

References · 112

  1. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  2. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  3. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  4. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  5. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  6. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  7. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  8. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  9. 2015You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detectioncited by 4,829
  10. 2020Deformable DETR: Deformable Transformers for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 3,410
  11. 2015SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detectorcited by 3,125
  12. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
38 more
  1. 2018YOLOv3: An Incremental Improvementcited by 2,652
  2. 2017CARLA: An Open Urban Driving Simulatorcited by 2,431
  3. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,160
  4. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
  5. 2016Adversarial examples in the physical worldcited by 1,762
  6. 2020YOLOv4: Optimal Speed and Accuracy of Object Detectioncited by 1,624
  7. 2019FCOS: Fully Convolutional One-Stage Object Detectioncited by 1,573
  8. 2016YOLO9000: Better, Faster, Strongercited by 1,429
  9. 2019MMDetection: Open MMLab Detection Toolbox and Benchmarkcited by 1,379
  10. 2019Deep High-Resolution Representation Learning for Human Pose Estimationcited by 1,339
  11. 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
  12. 2017Cascade R-CNN: Delving into High Quality Object Detectioncited by 1,275
  13. 2019Objects as Pointscited by 1,172
  14. 2021YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021cited by 1,064
  15. 2022YOLOv7: Trainable bag-of-freebies sets new state-of-the-art for real-time object detectorscited by 978
  16. 2018Path Aggregation Network for Instance Segmentationcited by 796
  17. 2018CornerNet: Detecting Objects as Paired Keypointscited by 763
  18. 2022Exploring Plain Vision Transformer Backbones for Object Detectioncited by 723
  19. 2020RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmarkcited by 659
  20. 2022DAB-DETR: Dynamic Anchor Boxes are Better Queries for DETRcited by 569
  21. 2019Bridging the Gap Between Anchor-based and Anchor-free Detection via Adaptive Training Sample Selectioncited by 539
  22. 2019Object Detection in 20 Years: A Surveycited by 528
  23. 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 524
  24. 2017Adversarial Patchcited by 514
  25. 2024YOLOv10: Real-Time End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 508
  26. 2020Sparse R-CNN: End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Proposalscited by 494
  27. 2019Res2Net: A New Multi-scale Backbone Architecturecited by 468
  28. 2020ResNeSt: Split-Attention Networkscited by 445
  29. 2019Cascade R-CNN: High Quality Object Detection and Instance Segmentationcited by 428
  30. 2021Conditional DETR for Fast Training Convergencecited by 422
  31. 2024YOLOv9: Learning What You Want to Learn Using Programmable Gradient Informationcited by 422
  32. 2020Generalized Focal Loss: Learning Qualified and Distributed Bounding Boxes for Dense Object Detectioncited by 408
  33. 2019Benchmarking Robustness in Object Detection: Autonomous Driving when Winter is Comingcited by 332
  34. 2019NAS-FPN: Learning Scalable Feature Pyramid Architecture for Object Detectioncited by 289
  35. 2022YOLOv6: A Single-Stage Object Detection Framework for Industrial Applicationscited by 273
  36. 2022DETRs with Collaborative Hybrid Assignments Trainingcited by 273
  37. 2019Fooling automated surveillance cameras: adversarial patches to attack person detectioncited by 268
  38. 2019RepPoints: Point Set Representation for Object Detectioncited by 264

50 most cited of 112 All 112 (JSON)

Built on by

Not cited yet.