mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Explore Cross-Codec Quality-Rate Convex Hulls Relation for Adaptive Streaming

arXiv 2408.09044 ↗First posted 16 Aug 2024eess.IVcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the ongoing advancement of video technology and the emergence of new video platforms, suppliers of video contents are striving to ensure that the video quality meets the desire of consumers. Accessing a limited amount of channel bandwidth, they are often looking for a novel approach to decrease the use of data and thus the required energy and cost. This study evaluates the Quality Rate performance of H.264, H.265, and VP9 codecs across resolutions (960*544, 1920*1080, 3840*2160) to optimize video quality while minimizing bitrate, crucial for energy and cost efficiency. At this approach, original videos at native resolutions were encoded, decoded, and rescaled using FFmpeg. For each resolution, encoding and decoding were performed at various quantization levels. Quality Rate (QR) curves were generated using PSNR and VMAF metric against bitrate. Convex Hull curves were then derived and mathematically modelled for each resolution. The procedure was systematically applied to H.264, H.265, and VP9 codecs. Results indicate that increasing CRF values reduce bitrate, PSNR, and VMAF, with PSNR ranging between 20-40 dB. Logarithmic polynomial modelling of convex hulls demonstrated high accuracy, with low RMSE and high R-Squared values. These findings suggest that the convex hull of one codec can predict the performance of others, aiding future content-driven prediction methodologies and enhancing adaptive streaming efficiency. Keywords: Video Codecs, Adaptive Streaming, Compression, Bitrate, PSNR, VMAF, H.264, H.265, VP9

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Aug 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Comparison of HDR quality metrics in Per-Clip Lagrangian multiplier optimisation with AV1
  2. 2026Content-Driven Frame-Level Bit Prediction for Rate Control in Versatile Video Coding ↗
  3. 2023The Bjontegaard Bible -- Why your Way of Comparing Video Codecs May Be Wrong
  4. 2026Energy-Aware Frame Rate Selection for Video Coding
  5. 2024Encoder-Quantization-Motion-based Video Quality Metrics
  6. 2023Deep Learning-Based Real-Time Quality Control of Standard Video Compression for Live Streaming
  7. 2022Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of High-Motion Sports Videos at Low-Bitrates
  8. 2026Bit Allocation Transfer for Perceptual Quality Enhancement of Traditional Video Codecs