Energy-Aware Frame Rate Selection for Video Coding
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The main contributions of this paper are twofold: First, we present an in-depth analysis of the impact of frame rate reductions on the visual quality of the video and the encoding as well as decoding energy. Second, we propose a lightweight frame rate selection method for energy- and quality-aware encoding. Concerning the first contribution, this paper performs extensive encoding and decoding measurements, followed by an investigation of the impact of temporal downsampling on the energy demand of encoding and decoding at different frame rates. Furthermore, we determine the objective visual quality of the downsampled videos. As a result of this investigation, we identify content- and quantization-setting-dependent energy-aware frame rates, i.e., the temporal downsampling factors that lead to Pareto-optimality in terms of energy and quality. We demonstrate that significant energy savings are achieved while maintaining constant visual quality. Subsequently, a subjective experiment is conducted to verify this observation regarding perceptual quality using mean opinion scores. As the second contribution, we propose an energy-aware frame rate selection method that extracts spatio-temporal features from the video sequences. Based on these features, the proposed method employs a feature-based supervised machine learning approach to predict energy-aware frame rates for a given quantization parameter and video sequence, aiming to reduce energy consumption during encoding and decoding. The experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method offers significant energy savings, with an average of 17.46% and 17.60% of encoding and decoding energy demand reduction, respectively, alongside 3.38% average bitrate savings at a constant quality.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Mar 2026.
Builds on
10 of 53 references.
References · 10
- 2023The Bjontegaard Bible -- Why your Way of Comparing Video Codecs May Be Wrongcited by 5
- 2021Space-Time Video Regularity and Visual Fidelity: Compression, Resolution and Frame Rate Adaptationcited by 3
- 2022Sweet Streams are Made of This: The System Engineer's View on Energy Efficiency in Video Communicationscited by 2
- 2023Video Decoding Energy Reduction Using Temporal-Domain Filteringcited by 2
- 2020Quality-driven Variable Frame-Rate for Green Video Coding in Broadcast Applicationscited by 1
- 2022Modeling the HEVC Encoding Energy Using the Encoder Processing Timecited by 1
- 2022Matched Quality Evaluation of Temporally Downsampled Videos with Non-Integer Factorscited by 1
- 2023Power-Efficient Video Streaming on Mobile Devices Using Optimal Spatial Scalingcited by 1
- 2023Video Decoding Energy Estimation Using Processor Eventscited by 1
- 2024Towards Video Codec Performance Evaluation: A Rate-Energy-Distortion Perspectivecited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2022Joint Optimization of Rate, Distortion, and Decoding Energy for HEVC Intraframe Coding ↗
- 2021A Survey on Perceptually Optimized Video Coding
- 2022Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of High-Motion Sports Videos at Low-Bitrates
- 2023Comparison of HDR quality metrics in Per-Clip Lagrangian multiplier optimisation with AV1
- 2026Evaluating the Effect of Compression on Video Temporal Consistency Using Objective Quality Metrics ↗
- 2024Explore Cross-Codec Quality-Rate Convex Hulls Relation for Adaptive Streaming
- 2025Fine-Grained Motion Compression and Selective Temporal Fusion for Neural B-Frame Video Coding
- 2026Beyond the Golden Data: Resolving the Motion-Vision Quality Dilemma via Timestep Selective Training