mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Learning-Based Real-Time Quality Control of Standard Video Compression for Live Streaming

arXiv 2311.12918 ↗First posted 21 Nov 2023eess.IV cs.IT cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Ensuring high-quality video content for wireless users has become increasingly vital. Nevertheless, maintaining a consistent level of video quality faces challenges due to the fluctuating encoded bitrate, primarily caused by dynamic video content, especially in live streaming scenarios. Video compression is typically employed to eliminate unnecessary redundancies within and between video frames, thereby reducing the required bandwidth for video transmission. The encoded bitrate and the quality of the compressed video depend on encoder parameters, specifically, the quantization parameter (QP). Poor choices of encoder parameters can result in reduced bandwidth efficiency and high likelihood of non-conformance. Non-conformance refers to the violation of the peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) constraint for an encoded video segment. To address these issues, a real-time deep learning-based H.264 controller is proposed. This controller dynamically estimates the optimal encoder parameters based on the content of a video chunk with minimal delay. The objective is to maintain video quality in terms of PSNR above a specified threshold while minimizing the average bitrate of the compressed video. Experimental results, conducted on both QCIF dataset and a diverse range of random videos from public datasets, validate the effectiveness of this approach. Notably, it achieves improvements of up to 2.5 times in average bandwidth usage compared to the state-of-the-art adaptive bitrate video streaming, with a negligible non-conformance probability below 10-2.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Nov 2023.

Builds on

3 of 9 references.

References · 3

  1. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,502
  2. 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,524
  3. 2020X3D: Expanding Architectures for Efficient Video Recognitioncited by 637

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Differentiable Proxy Learning for Adaptive Quantization Control in H.264 Video Coding
  2. 2024Encoder-Quantization-Motion-based Video Quality Metrics
  3. 2024Explore Cross-Codec Quality-Rate Convex Hulls Relation for Adaptive Streaming
  4. 2026Bit Allocation Transfer for Perceptual Quality Enhancement of Traditional Video Codecs
  5. 2023The Bjontegaard Bible -- Why your Way of Comparing Video Codecs May Be Wrong
  6. 2026SCALED : Surrogate-gradient for Codec-Aware Learning of Downsampling in ABR Streaming
  7. 2026Content-Driven Frame-Level Bit Prediction for Rate Control in Versatile Video Coding ↗
  8. 2024Neural Video Compression with Feature Modulation