mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Personhood credentials: Artificial intelligence and the value of privacy-preserving tools to distinguish who is real online

arXiv 2408.07892 ↗First posted 15 Aug 2024cs.CYcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Anonymity is an important principle online. However, malicious actors have long used misleading identities to conduct fraud, spread disinformation, and carry out other deceptive schemes. With the advent of increasingly capable AI, bad actors can amplify the potential scale and effectiveness of their operations, intensifying the challenge of balancing anonymity and trustworthiness online. In this paper, we analyze the value of a new tool to address this challenge: "personhood credentials" (PHCs), digital credentials that empower users to demonstrate that they are real people -- not AIs -- to online services, without disclosing any personal information. Such credentials can be issued by a range of trusted institutions -- governments or otherwise. A PHC system, according to our definition, could be local or global, and does not need to be biometrics-based. Two trends in AI contribute to the urgency of the challenge: AI's increasing indistinguishability from people online (i.e., lifelike content and avatars, agentic activity), and AI's increasing scalability (i.e., cost-effectiveness, accessibility). Drawing on a long history of research into anonymous credentials and "proof-of-personhood" systems, personhood credentials give people a way to signal their trustworthiness on online platforms, and offer service providers new tools for reducing misuse by bad actors. In contrast, existing countermeasures to automated deception -- such as CAPTCHAs -- are inadequate against sophisticated AI, while stringent identity verification solutions are insufficiently private for many use-cases. After surveying the benefits of personhood credentials, we also examine deployment risks and design challenges. We conclude with actionable next steps for policymakers, technologists, and standards bodies to consider in consultation with the public.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 15 Aug 2024.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 10; 2026: 5.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Disclosure By Design: Identity Transparency as a Behavioural Property of Conversational AI Models
  2. 2025DIRF: A Framework for Digital Identity Protection and Clone Governance in Agentic AI Systems
  3. 2026From Fragmentation to Integration: Exploring the Design Space of AI Agents for Human-as-the-Unit Privacy Management
  4. 2026PersonaFingerprint: Measuring Persona Inference on Modern Websites with LLM-Driven Browsing
  5. 2026Security Risks of AI Agents Hiring Humans: An Empirical Marketplace Study
  6. 2026LEGIT: Credentialing Protocol for Trustworthy AI Agent Marketplaces
  7. 2025PrivacyBench: A Conversational Benchmark for Evaluating Privacy in Personalized AI
  8. 2026From Weak Cues to Real Identities: Evaluating Inference-Driven De-Anonymization in LLM Agents