mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Zero-shot 3D Segmentation of Abdominal Organs in CT Scans Using Segment Anything Model 2: Adapting Video Tracking Capabilities for 3D Medical Imaging

arXiv 2408.06170 ↗First posted 12 Aug 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Objectives: To evaluate the zero-shot performance of Segment Anything Model 2 (SAM 2) in 3D segmentation of abdominal organs in CT scans, and to investigate the effects of prompt settings on segmentation results. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, we used a subset of the TotalSegmentator CT dataset from eight institutions to assess SAM 2's ability to segment eight abdominal organs. Segmentation was initiated from three different z-coordinate levels (caudal, mid, and cranial levels) of each organ. Performance was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). We also analyzed the impact of "negative prompts," which explicitly exclude certain regions from the segmentation process, on accuracy. Results: 123 patients (mean age, 60.7 ± 15.5 years; 63 men, 60 women) were evaluated. As a zero-shot approach, larger organs with clear boundaries demonstrated high segmentation performance, with mean DSCs as follows: liver 0.821 ± 0.192, right kidney 0.862 ± 0.212, left kidney 0.870 ± 0.154, and spleen 0.891 ± 0.131. Smaller organs showed lower performance: gallbladder 0.531 ± 0.291, pancreas 0.361 ± 0.197, and adrenal glands, right 0.203 ± 0.222, left 0.308 ± 0.234. The initial slice for segmentation and the use of negative prompts significantly influenced the results. By removing negative prompts from the input, the DSCs significantly decreased for six organs. Conclusion: SAM 2 demonstrated promising zero-shot performance in segmenting certain abdominal organs in CT scans, particularly larger organs. Performance was significantly influenced by input negative prompts and initial slice selection, highlighting the importance of optimizing these factors.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Aug 2024.

Builds on

14 of 34 references.

References · 14

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  2. 2023Segment Anythingcited by 8,234
  3. 2024SAM 2: Segment Anything in Images and Videoscited by 2,863
  4. 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 830
  5. 2022TotalSegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in CT imagescited by 613
  6. 2023Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Analysis: an Experimental Studycited by 291
  7. 2023Segment Anything in Medical Imagescited by 227
  8. 2020AbdomenCT-1K: Is Abdominal Organ Segmentation A Solved Problem?cited by 224
  9. 2024Medical SAM 2: Segment medical images as video via Segment Anything Model 2cited by 154
  10. 2024Segment Anything Model for Medical Image Segmentation: Current Applications and Future Directionscited by 97
  11. 2024AbdomenAtlas: A Large-Scale, Detailed-Annotated, & Multi-Center Dataset for Efficient Transfer Learning and Open Algorithmic Benchmarkingcited by 65
  12. 2023AbdomenAtlas-8K: Annotating 8,000 CT Volumes for Multi-Organ Segmentation in Three Weekscited by 52
2 more
  1. 2024Segment Anything in Medical Images and Videos: Benchmark and Deploymentcited by 42
  2. 2024Segment anything model 2: an application to 2D and 3D medical imagescited by 28

Built on by

Not cited yet.