mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Structure and Reduction of MCTS for Explainable-AI

arXiv 2408.05488 ↗First posted 10 Aug 2024cs.AI cs.IT math.ITcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Complex sequential decision-making planning problems, covering infinite states' space have been shown to be solvable by AlphaZero type of algorithms. Such an approach that trains a neural model while simulating projection of futures with a Monte Carlo Tree Search algorithm were shown to be applicable to real life planning problems. As such, engineers and users interacting with the resulting policy of behavior might benefit from obtaining automated explanations about these planners' decisions offline or online. This paper focuses on the information within the Monte Carlo Tree Search data structure. Given its construction, this information contains much of the reasoning of the sequential decision-making algorithm and is essential for its explainability. We show novel methods using information theoretic tools for the simplification and reduction of the Monte Carlo Tree Search and the extraction of information. Such information can be directly used for the construction of human understandable explanations. We show that basic explainability quantities can be calculated with limited additional computational cost, as an integrated part of the Monte Carlo Tree Search construction process. We focus on the theoretical and algorithmic aspects and provide examples of how the methods presented here can be used in the construction of human understandable explanations.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Aug 2024.

Builds on

9 of 28 references.

References · 9

  1. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
  2. 2018Metrics for Explainable AI: Challenges and Prospectscited by 257
  3. 2021Monte Carlo Tree Search: A Review of Recent Modifications and Applicationscited by 158
  4. 2020On quantitative aspects of model interpretabilitycited by 71
  5. 2019Combining Planning and Deep Reinforcement Learning in Tactical Decision Making for Autonomous Drivingcited by 52
  6. 2019Interestingness Elements for Explainable Reinforcement Learning: Understanding Agents' Capabilities and Limitationscited by 50
  7. 2019Explainability in Human-Agent Systemscited by 34
  8. 2019Exploring Computational User Models for Agent Policy Summarizationcited by 29
  9. 2021Identifying Reasoning Flaws in Planning-Based RL Using Tree Explanationscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.