Benchmarking Conventional and Learned Video Codecs with a Low-Delay Configuration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent advances in video compression have seen significant coding performance improvements with the development of new standards and learning-based video codecs. However, most of these works focus on application scenarios that allow a certain amount of system delay (e.g., Random Access mode in MPEG codecs), which is not always acceptable for live delivery. This paper conducts a comparative study of state-of-the-art conventional and learned video coding methods based on a low delay configuration. Specifically, this study includes two MPEG standard codecs (H.266/VVC VTM and JVET ECM), two AOM codecs (AV1 libaom and AVM), and two recent neural video coding models (DCVC-DC and DCVC-FM). To allow a fair and meaningful comparison, the evaluation was performed on test sequences defined in the AOM and MPEG common test conditions in the YCbCr 4:2:0 color space. The evaluation results show that the JVET ECM codecs offer the best overall coding performance among all codecs tested, with a 16.1% (based on PSNR) average BD-rate saving over AOM AVM, and 11.0% over DCVC-FM. We also observed inconsistent performance with the learned video codecs, DCVC-DC and DCVC-FM, for test content with large background motions.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Aug 2024.
Builds on
13 of 32 references.
References · 13
- 2018DVC: An End-to-end Deep Video Compression Frameworkcited by 324
- 2021NeRV: Neural Representations for Videoscited by 255
- 2021Deep Contextual Video Compressioncited by 216
- 2023Neural Video Compression with Diverse Contextscited by 155
- 2021FVC: A New Framework towards Deep Video Compression in Feature Spacecited by 149
- 2022Hybrid Spatial-Temporal Entropy Modelling for Neural Video Compressioncited by 123
- 2024Neural Video Compression with Feature Modulationcited by 115
- 2021Temporal Context Mining for Learned Video Compressioncited by 112
- 2022VCT: A Video Compression Transformercited by 74
- 2023HiNeRV: Video Compression with Hierarchical Encoding-based Neural Representationcited by 70
- 2022CANF-VC: Conditional Augmented Normalizing Flows for Video Compressioncited by 44
- 2020BVI-CC: A Dataset for Research on Video Compression and Quality Assessmentcited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
6 papers.
- 2025GIViC: Generative Implicit Video Compressioncited by 9
- 2026Enhanced Neural Video Representation Compression Across Extreme Complexity and Quality Scalescited by 3
- 2025GFix: Perceptually Enhanced Gaussian Splatting Video Compressioncited by 2
- 2025Compressed Video Super-Resolution based on Hierarchical Encodingcited by 1
- 2025SIEDD: Shared-Implicit Encoder with Discrete Decoderscited by 1
- 2026High-Fidelity Video Compression based on Invertible Neural Transform and Implicit Conditioningcited by 0
- 2026Enhanced Neural Video Representation Compression Across Extreme Complexity and Quality Scales26 Jun 2026
- 2026High-Fidelity Video Compression based on Invertible Neural Transform and Implicit Conditioning11 Jun 2026
- 2025GFix: Perceptually Enhanced Gaussian Splatting Video Compression10 Nov 2025
- 2025SIEDD: Shared-Implicit Encoder with Discrete Decoders29 Jun 2025
- 2025Compressed Video Super-Resolution based on Hierarchical Encoding17 Jun 2025
- 2025GIViC: Generative Implicit Video Compression25 Mar 2025