Counterfactuals and Uncertainty-Based Explainable Paradigm for the Automated Detection and Segmentation of Renal Cysts in Computed Tomography Images: A Multi-Center Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Routine computed tomography (CT) scans often detect a wide range of renal cysts, some of which may be malignant. Early and precise localization of these cysts can significantly aid quantitative image analysis. Current segmentation methods, however, do not offer sufficient interpretability at the feature and pixel levels, emphasizing the necessity for an explainable framework that can detect and rectify model inaccuracies. We developed an interpretable segmentation framework and validated it on a multi-centric dataset. A Variational Autoencoder Generative Adversarial Network (VAE-GAN) was employed to learn the latent representation of 3D input patches and reconstruct input images. Modifications in the latent representation using the gradient of the segmentation model generated counterfactual explanations for varying dice similarity coefficients (DSC). Radiomics features extracted from these counterfactual images, using a ground truth cyst mask, were analyzed to determine their correlation with segmentation performance. The DSCs for the original and VAE-GAN reconstructed images for counterfactual image generation showed no significant differences. Counterfactual explanations highlighted how variations in cyst image features influence segmentation outcomes and showed model discrepancies. Radiomics features correlating positively and negatively with dice scores were identified. The uncertainty of the predicted segmentation masks was estimated using posterior sampling of the weight space. The combination of counterfactual explanations and uncertainty maps provided a deeper understanding of the image features within the segmented renal cysts that lead to high uncertainty. The proposed segmentation framework not only achieved high segmentation accuracy but also increased interpretability regarding how image features impact segmentation performance.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Aug 2024.
Builds on
15 of 44 references.
References · 15
- 2016Perceptual Losses for Real-Time Style Transfer and Super-Resolutioncited by 2,694
- 2017Counterfactual Explanations without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPRcited by 1,089
- 2017Generalised Dice overlap as a deep learning loss function for highly unbalanced segmentationscited by 620
- 2015Autoencoding beyond pixels using a learned similarity metriccited by 407
- 2014Deeply-Supervised Netscited by 367
- 2019Counterfactual Visual Explanationscited by 313
- 2019Evaluation of Algorithms for Multi-Modality Whole Heart Segmentation: An Open-Access Grand Challengecited by 100
- 2021Transparency of Deep Neural Networks for Medical Image Analysis: A Review of Interpretability Methodscited by 83
- 2015Denoising Criterion for Variational Auto-Encoding Frameworkcited by 43
- 2021End-to-end Prostate Cancer Detection in bpMRI via 3D CNNs: Effects of Attention Mechanisms, Clinical Priori and Decoupled False Positive Reductioncited by 32
- 2020Estimating Uncertainty in Neural Networks for Cardiac MRI Segmentation: A Benchmark Studycited by 19
- 2022Efficient Bayesian Uncertainty Estimation for nnU-Netcited by 19
3 more
- 2022Layer Ensembles: A Single-Pass Uncertainty Estimation in Deep Learning for Segmentationcited by 15
- 2017Deep Supervision for Pancreatic Cyst Segmentation in Abdominal CT Scanscited by 10
- 2021Fully Automatic Deep Learning Framework for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Detection on Computed Tomographycited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.