mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Label Augmentation for Neural Networks Robustness

arXiv 2408.01977 ↗First posted 4 Aug 2024cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Out-of-distribution generalization can be categorized into two types: common perturbations arising from natural variations in the real world and adversarial perturbations that are intentionally crafted to deceive neural networks. While deep neural networks excel in accuracy under the assumption of identical distributions between training and test data, they often encounter out-of-distribution scenarios resulting in a significant decline in accuracy. Data augmentation methods can effectively enhance robustness against common corruptions, but they typically fall short in improving robustness against adversarial perturbations. In this study, we develop Label Augmentation (LA), which enhances robustness against both common and intentional perturbations and improves uncertainty estimation. Our findings indicate a Clean error rate improvement of up to 23.29% when employing LA in comparisons to the baseline. Additionally, it enhances robustness under common corruptions benchmark by up to 24.23%. When tested against FGSM and PGD attacks, improvements in adversarial robustness are noticeable, with enhancements of up to 53.18% for FGSM and 24.46% for PGD attacks.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 70 of its 86 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 Aug 2024.

Builds on

70 of 86 references.

References · 70

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  3. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  4. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  5. 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
  6. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  7. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  8. 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
  9. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  10. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  11. 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
  12. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
38 more
  1. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  2. 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
  3. 2020Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attackscited by 1,442
  4. 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,430
  5. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  6. 2019Can You Trust Your Model's Uncertainty? Evaluating Predictive Uncertainty Under Dataset Shiftcited by 1,274
  7. 2018Obfuscated Gradients Give a False Sense of Security: Circumventing Defenses to Adversarial Examplescited by 1,259
  8. 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
  9. 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
  10. 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
  11. 2019AugMix: A Simple Data Processing Method to Improve Robustness and Uncertaintycited by 897
  12. 2017A Survey on Multi-Task Learningcited by 838
  13. 2017Ensemble Adversarial Training: Attacks and Defensescited by 833
  14. 2019Square Attack: a query-efficient black-box adversarial attack via random searchcited by 682
  15. 2015Distillation as a Defense to Adversarial Perturbations against Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  16. 2021A Survey of Uncertainty in Deep Neural Networkscited by 675
  17. 2017Feature Squeezing: Detecting Adversarial Examples in Deep Neural Networkscited by 484
  18. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 439
  19. 2021Towards Out-Of-Distribution Generalization: A Surveycited by 431
  20. 2019Unlabeled Data Improves Adversarial Robustnesscited by 415
  21. 2019Which Tasks Should Be Learned Together in Multi-task Learning?cited by 367
  22. 2019Minimally distorted Adversarial Examples with a Fast Adaptive Boundary Attackcited by 333
  23. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
  24. 2021Improving Robustness using Generated Datacited by 233
  25. 2017On Detecting Adversarial Perturbationscited by 232
  26. 2023Better Diffusion Models Further Improve Adversarial Trainingcited by 207
  27. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  28. 2022Improving Out-of-Distribution Robustness via Selective Augmentationcited by 202
  29. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  30. 2018Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations?cited by 198
  31. 2017The Space of Transferable Adversarial Examplescited by 156
  32. 2016Technical Report on the CleverHans v2.1.0 Adversarial Examples Librarycited by 123
  33. 2016Understanding How Image Quality Affects Deep Neural Networkscited by 118
  34. 2019Adversarial Examples Are a Natural Consequence of Test Error in Noisecited by 114
  35. 2019Improving Robustness Without Sacrificing Accuracy with Patch Gaussian Augmentationcited by 105
  36. 2021On Interaction Between Augmentations and Corruptions in Natural Corruption Robustnesscited by 98
  37. 2018Data Augmentation by Pairing Samples for Images Classificationcited by 96
  38. 2022A Comprehensive Survey of Image Augmentation Techniques for Deep Learningcited by 95

50 most cited of 70 All 70 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.