mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Interpreting Global Perturbation Robustness of Image Models using Axiomatic Spectral Importance Decomposition

arXiv 2408.01139 ↗First posted 2 Aug 2024cs.AI cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Perturbation robustness evaluates the vulnerabilities of models, arising from a variety of perturbations, such as data corruptions and adversarial attacks. Understanding the mechanisms of perturbation robustness is critical for global interpretability. We present a model-agnostic, global mechanistic interpretability method to interpret the perturbation robustness of image models. This research is motivated by two key aspects. First, previous global interpretability works, in tandem with robustness benchmarks, e.g. mean corruption error (mCE), are not designed to directly interpret the mechanisms of perturbation robustness within image models. Second, we notice that the spectral signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of perturbed natural images exponentially decay over the frequency. This power-law-like decay implies that: Low-frequency signals are generally more robust than high-frequency signals -- yet high classification accuracy can not be achieved by low-frequency signals alone. By applying Shapley value theory, our method axiomatically quantifies the predictive powers of robust features and non-robust features within an information theory framework. Our method, dubbed as I-ASIDE (Image Axiomatic Spectral Importance Decomposition Explanation), provides a unique insight into model robustness mechanisms. We conduct extensive experiments over a variety of vision models pre-trained on ImageNet to show that I-ASIDE can not only measure the perturbation robustness but also provide interpretations of its mechanisms.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 63 of its 105 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2024.

Builds on

63 of 105 references.

References · 63

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,488
  4. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
  5. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
  6. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  7. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,040
  8. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,590
  9. 2017Axiomatic Attribution for Deep Networkscited by 3,350
  10. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
  11. 2015Learning Deep Features for Discriminative Localizationcited by 2,430
  12. 2013Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Mapscited by 2,348
38 more
  1. 2020Knowledge Distillation: A Surveycited by 1,578
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,543
  3. 2017Learning Important Features Through Propagating Activation Differencescited by 1,454
  4. 2017Interpretability Beyond Feature Attribution: Quantitative Testing with Concept Activation Vectors (TCAV)cited by 1,309
  5. 2017SmoothGrad: removing noise by adding noisecited by 1,097
  6. 2020Concept Bottleneck Modelscited by 1,022
  7. 2021Transformers in Vision: A Surveycited by 1,009
  8. 2018Deep Anomaly Detection with Outlier Exposurecited by 939
  9. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 873
  10. 2017Network Dissection: Quantifying Interpretability of Deep Visual Representationscited by 703
  11. 2020A Survey on Visual Transformercited by 653
  12. 2020Measuring Robustness to Natural Distribution Shifts in Image Classificationcited by 452
  13. 2024Mechanistic Interpretability for AI Safety -- A Reviewcited by 415
  14. 2020A Survey of Convolutional Neural Networks: Analysis, Applications, and Prospectscited by 396
  15. 2019Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networkscited by 360
  16. 2019High Frequency Component Helps Explain the Generalization of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 310
  17. 2020A Survey on Neural Network Interpretabilitycited by 291
  18. 2021Recent Advances in Adversarial Training for Adversarial Robustnesscited by 276
  19. 2020A Comprehensive Survey of Neural Architecture Search: Challenges and Solutionscited by 253
  20. 2021Learning with Noisy Labels Revisited: A Study Using Real-World Human Annotationscited by 253
  21. 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
  22. 2020What Should Not Be Contrastive in Contrastive Learningcited by 224
  23. 2018Using Trusted Data to Train Deep Networks on Labels Corrupted by Severe Noisecited by 216
  24. 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
  25. 2019Explaining individual predictions when features are dependent: More accurate approximations to Shapley valuescited by 205
  26. 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
  27. 2020Bag of Tricks for Adversarial Trainingcited by 199
  28. 2016Layer-wise Relevance Propagation for Neural Networks with Local Renormalization Layerscited by 197
  29. 2016Synthesizing the preferred inputs for neurons in neural networks via deep generator networkscited by 181
  30. 2018Training behavior of deep neural network in frequency domaincited by 174
  31. 2018Local Rule-Based Explanations of Black Box Decision Systemscited by 165
  32. 2017Deep Learning is Robust to Massive Label Noisecited by 164
  33. 2016Improving the Robustness of Deep Neural Networks via Stability Trainingcited by 156
  34. 2022Understanding The Robustness in Vision Transformerscited by 144
  35. 2016Multifaceted Feature Visualization: Uncovering the Different Types of Features Learned By Each Neuron in Deep Neural Networkscited by 106
  36. 2021On the Adversarial Robustness of Vision Transformerscited by 104
  37. 2018Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Surface Variationscited by 99
  38. 2018SparseFool: a few pixels make a big differencecited by 94

50 most cited of 63 All 63 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.