Online Detection of Anomalies in Temporal Knowledge Graphs with Interpretability
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Temporal knowledge graphs (TKGs) are valuable resources for capturing evolving relationships among entities, yet they are often plagued by noise, necessitating robust anomaly detection mechanisms. Existing dynamic graph anomaly detection approaches struggle to capture the rich semantics introduced by node and edge categories within TKGs, while TKG embedding methods lack interpretability, undermining the credibility of anomaly detection. Moreover, these methods falter in adapting to pattern changes and semantic drifts resulting from knowledge updates. To tackle these challenges, we introduce AnoT, an efficient TKG summarization method tailored for interpretable online anomaly detection in TKGs. AnoT begins by summarizing a TKG into a novel rule graph, enabling flexible inference of complex patterns in TKGs. When new knowledge emerges, AnoT maps it onto a node in the rule graph and traverses the rule graph recursively to derive the anomaly score of the knowledge. The traversal yields reachable nodes that furnish interpretable evidence for the validity or the anomalous of the new knowledge. Overall, AnoT embodies a detector-updater-monitor architecture, encompassing a detector for offline TKG summarization and online scoring, an updater for real-time rule graph updates based on emerging knowledge, and a monitor for estimating the approximation error of the rule graph. Experimental results on four real-world datasets demonstrate that AnoT surpasses existing methods significantly in terms of accuracy and interoperability. All of the raw datasets and the implementation of AnoT are provided in https://github.com/zjs123/ANoT.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 67 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Aug 2024.
Builds on
21 of 67 references.
References · 21
- 2018Learning Sequence Encoders for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 145
- 2020Handling Missing Data with Graph Representation Learningcited by 132
- 2020Tensor Decompositions for temporal knowledge base completioncited by 115
- 2021Temporal Knowledge Graph Reasoning Based on Evolutional Representation Learningcited by 106
- 2019Diachronic Embedding for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 104
- 2017Knowledge Graph Completion via Complex Tensor Factorizationcited by 80
- 2020TeMP: Temporal Message Passing for Temporal Knowledge Graph Completioncited by 61
- 2021Anomaly Detection in Dynamic Graphs via Transformercited by 57
- 2020TeRo: A Time-aware Knowledge Graph Embedding via Temporal Rotationcited by 48
- 2016Fast Memory-efficient Anomaly Detection in Streaming Heterogeneous Graphscited by 37
- 2020Temporal Knowledge Base Completion: New Algorithms and Evaluation Protocolscited by 30
- 2022EvoKG: Jointly Modeling Event Time and Network Structure for Reasoning over Temporal Knowledge Graphscited by 27
9 more
- 2020F-FADE: Frequency Factorization for Anomaly Detection in Edge Streamscited by 26
- 2019A mathematical theory of cooperative communicationcited by 23
- 2018Triple Trustworthiness Measurement for Knowledge Graphcited by 16
- 2020Mining Persistent Activity in Continually Evolving Networkscited by 13
- 2020The Minimum Description Length Principle for Pattern Mining: A Surveycited by 13
- 2022Subset Node Anomaly Tracking over Large Dynamic Graphscited by 12
- 2019Efficient Knowledge Graph Accuracy Evaluationcited by 11
- 2020What is Normal, What is Strange, and What is Missing in a Knowledge Graph: Unified Characterization via Inductive Summarizationcited by 9
- 2021Sketch-Based Anomaly Detection in Streaming Graphscited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.