mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Benchmarking Multi-dimensional AIGC Video Quality Assessment: A Dataset and Unified Model

arXiv 2407.21408 ↗First posted 31 Jul 2024cs.CVcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI)-driven video generation has gained significant attention. Consequently, there is a growing need for accurate video quality assessment (VQA) metrics to evaluate the perceptual quality of AI-generated content (AIGC) videos and optimize video generation models. However, assessing the quality of AIGC videos remains a significant challenge because these videos often exhibit highly complex distortions, such as unnatural actions and irrational objects. To address this challenge, we systematically investigate the AIGC-VQA problem, considering both subjective and objective quality assessment perspectives. For the subjective perspective, we construct the Large-scale Generated Video Quality assessment (LGVQ) dataset, consisting of 2,808 AIGC videos generated by 6 video generation models using 468 carefully curated text prompts. We evaluate the perceptual quality of AIGC videos from three critical dimensions: spatial quality, temporal quality, and text-video alignment. For the objective perspective, we establish a benchmark for evaluating existing quality assessment metrics on the LGVQ dataset. Our findings show that current metrics perform poorly on this dataset, highlighting a gap in effective evaluation tools. To bridge this gap, we propose the Unify Generated Video Quality assessment (UGVQ) model, designed to accurately evaluate the multi-dimensional quality of AIGC videos. The UGVQ model integrates the visual and motion features of videos with the textual features of their corresponding prompts, forming a unified quality-aware feature representation tailored to AIGC videos. Experimental results demonstrate that UGVQ achieves state-of-the-art performance on the LGVQ dataset across all three quality dimensions. Both the LGVQ dataset and the UGVQ model are publicly available on https://github.com/zczhang-sjtu/UGVQ.git.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 61 of its 90 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 Jul 2024.

Builds on

61 of 90 references.

References · 61

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
  3. 2020Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Modelscited by 21,076
  4. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  5. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
  6. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 7,005
  7. 2017Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Datasetcited by 3,270
  8. 2016Improved Techniques for Training GANscited by 2,970
  9. 2021CLIPScore: A Reference-free Evaluation Metric for Image Captioningcited by 2,424
  10. 2020RAFT: Recurrent All-Pairs Field Transforms for Optical Flowcited by 2,415
  11. 2018SlowFast Networks for Video Recognitioncited by 1,867
  12. 2023VBench: Comprehensive Benchmark Suite for Video Generative Modelscited by 1,822
38 more
  1. 2018Towards Accurate Generative Models of Video: A New Metric & Challengescited by 1,234
  2. 2021Frozen in Time: A Joint Video and Image Encoder for End-to-End Retrievalcited by 1,177
  3. 2021MUSIQ: Multi-scale Image Quality Transformercited by 1,081
  4. 2022Exploring CLIP for Assessing the Look and Feel of Imagescited by 991
  5. 2022CogVideo: Large-scale Pretraining for Text-to-Video Generation via Transformerscited by 985
  6. 2023Training Diffusion Models with Reinforcement Learningcited by 982
  7. 2023GenEval: An Object-Focused Framework for Evaluating Text-to-Image Alignmentcited by 972
  8. 2022Tune-A-Video: One-Shot Tuning of Image Diffusion Models for Text-to-Video Generationcited by 961
  9. 2023Text2Video-Zero: Text-to-Image Diffusion Models are Zero-Shot Video Generatorscited by 670
  10. 2023Structure and Content-Guided Video Synthesis with Diffusion Modelscited by 590
  11. 2023VideoCrafter1: Open Diffusion Models for High-Quality Video Generationcited by 535
  12. 2023VideoMAE V2: Scaling Video Masked Autoencoders with Dual Maskingcited by 528
  13. 2023Q-Align: Teaching LMMs for Visual Scoring via Discrete Text-Defined Levelscited by 503
  14. 2024Evaluating Text-to-Visual Generation with Image-to-Text Generationcited by 474
  15. 2017AVA: A Video Dataset of Spatio-temporally Localized Atomic Visual Actionscited by 449
  16. 2022InternVideo: General Video Foundation Models via Generative and Discriminative Learningcited by 447
  17. 2022Latent Video Diffusion Models for High-Fidelity Long Video Generationcited by 388
  18. 2019KonIQ-10k: An ecologically valid database for deep learning of blind image quality assessmentcited by 355
  19. 2023EvalCrafter: Benchmarking and Evaluating Large Video Generation Modelscited by 340
  20. 2023VideoFusion: Decomposed Diffusion Models for High-Quality Video Generationcited by 331
  21. 2022Exploring Video Quality Assessment on User Generated Contents from Aesthetic and Technical Perspectivescited by 320
  22. 2022CogView2: Faster and Better Text-to-Image Generation via Hierarchical Transformerscited by 307
  23. 2023Human Preference Score: Better Aligning Text-to-Image Models with Human Preferencecited by 287
  24. 2023Blind Image Quality Assessment via Vision-Language Correspondence: A Multitask Learning Perspectivecited by 280
  25. 2021N"UWA: Visual Synthesis Pre-training for Neural visUal World creAtioncited by 253
  26. 2023TOPIQ: A Top-down Approach from Semantics to Distortions for Image Quality Assessmentcited by 226
  27. 2023AMT: All-Pairs Multi-Field Transforms for Efficient Frame Interpolationcited by 180
  28. 2022FAST-VQA: Efficient End-to-end Video Quality Assessment with Fragment Samplingcited by 179
  29. 2021No-Reference Image Quality Assessment via Transformers, Relative Ranking, and Self-Consistencycited by 166
  30. 2019Quality Assessment of In-the-Wild Videoscited by 164
  31. 2017Video Generation From Textcited by 154
  32. 2020Patch-VQ: 'Patching Up' the Video Quality Problemcited by 147
  33. 2020UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Contentcited by 140
  34. 2020Uncertainty-Aware Blind Image Quality Assessment in the Laboratory and Wildcited by 134
  35. 2022A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videoscited by 129
  36. 2023FETV: A Benchmark for Fine-Grained Evaluation of Open-Domain Text-to-Video Generationcited by 122
  37. 2021RAPIQUE: Rapid and Accurate Video Quality Prediction of User Generated Contentcited by 100
  38. 2019VideoFlow: A Conditional Flow-Based Model for Stochastic Video Generationcited by 74

50 most cited of 61 All 61 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 5.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: