mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Combining Cognitive and Generative AI for Self-explanation in Interactive AI Agents

arXiv 2407.18335 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2024cs.AIcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Virtual Experimental Research Assistant (VERA) is an inquiry-based learning environment that empowers a learner to build conceptual models of complex ecological systems and experiment with agent-based simulations of the models. This study investigates the convergence of cognitive AI and generative AI for self-explanation in interactive AI agents such as VERA. From a cognitive AI viewpoint, we endow VERA with a functional model of its own design, knowledge, and reasoning represented in the Task--Method--Knowledge (TMK) language. From the perspective of generative AI, we use ChatGPT, LangChain, and Chain-of-Thought to answer user questions based on the VERA TMK model. Thus, we combine cognitive and generative AI to generate explanations about how VERA works and produces its answers. The preliminary evaluation of the generation of explanations in VERA on a bank of 66 questions derived from earlier work appears promising.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2024.

Builds on

10 of 42 references.

References · 10

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2022Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Modelscited by 12,302
  3. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  4. 2022Emergent Abilities of Large Language Modelscited by 2,483
  5. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 251
  6. 2021Principles of Explanation in Human-AI Systemscited by 25
  7. 2021Levels of explainable artificial intelligence for human-aligned conversational explanationscited by 21
  8. 2020Self-explaining AI as an alternative to interpretable AIcited by 18
  9. 2023Identifying Explanation Needs of End-users: Applying and Extending the XAI Question Bankcited by 8
  10. 2022Explanation as Question Answering based on a Task Model of the Agent's Designcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

3 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Integrating Cognitive AI with Generative Models for Enhanced Question Answering in Skill-based Learning
  2. 2026AI scientists produce results without reasoning scientifically
  3. 2025Curie: Toward Rigorous and Automated Scientific Experimentation with AI Agents
  4. 2025Self-Explanation in Social AI Agents
  5. 2025Knowledge Conceptualization Impacts RAG Efficacy
  6. 2026NatureBench: Can Coding Agents Match the Published SOTA of Nature-Family Papers?
  7. 2025Agent0: Unleashing Self-Evolving Agents from Zero Data via Tool-Integrated Reasoning
  8. 2022ScienceWorld: Is your Agent Smarter than a 5th Grader?