mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Self-explaining AI as an alternative to interpretable AI

arXiv 2002.05149 ↗First posted 12 Feb 2020cs.AI cs.CY cs.LGcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability to explain decisions made by AI systems is highly sought after, especially in domains where human lives are at stake such as medicine or autonomous vehicles. While it is often possible to approximate the input-output relations of deep neural networks with a few human-understandable rules, the discovery of the double descent phenomena suggests that such approximations do not accurately capture the mechanism by which deep neural networks work. Double descent indicates that deep neural networks typically operate by smoothly interpolating between data points rather than by extracting a few high level rules. As a result, neural networks trained on complex real world data are inherently hard to interpret and prone to failure if asked to extrapolate. To show how we might be able to trust AI despite these problems we introduce the concept of self-explaining AI. Self-explaining AIs are capable of providing a human-understandable explanation of each decision along with confidence levels for both the decision and explanation. For this approach to work, it is important that the explanation actually be related to the decision, ideally capturing the mechanism used to arrive at the explanation. Finally, we argue it is important that deep learning based systems include a "warning light" based on techniques from applicability domain analysis to warn the user if a model is asked to extrapolate outside its training distribution. For a video presentation of this talk see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Py7PVdcu7WY& .

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 12 Feb 2020.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2021: 2; 2022: 4; 2023: 3; 2024: 5; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

18 papers.

Sort:

  1. 2022Toward Transparent AI: A Survey on Interpreting the Inner Structures of Deep Neural Networkscited by 129
  2. 2022VCNet: A self-explaining model for realistic counterfactual generationcited by 20
  3. 2021Keep CALM and Improve Visual Feature Attributioncited by 15
  4. 2024Interpretability Needs a New Paradigmcited by 11
  5. 2023Survey of Consciousness Theory from Computational Perspectivecited by 3
  6. 2024Geometric Remove-and-Retrain (GOAR): Coordinate-Invariant eXplainable AI Assessmentcited by 3
  7. 2024Combining Cognitive and Generative AI for Self-explanation in Interactive AI Agentscited by 3
  8. 2023Approximation of group explainers with coalition structure using Monte Carlo sampling on the product space of coalitions and featurescited by 2
  9. 2023A Voting Approach for Explainable Classification with Rule Learningcited by 2
  10. 2021Uncertainty-Aware Training for Cardiac Resynchronisation Therapy Response Predictioncited by 1
  11. 2024xLP: Explainable Link Prediction for Master Data Managementcited by 1
  12. 2022Graph-based Neural Modules to Inspect Attention-based Architectures: A Position Papercited by 0
6 more
  1. 2022Providing Error Detection for Deep Learning Image Classifiers Using Self-Explainabilitycited by 0
  2. 2024Inductive Models for Artificial Intelligence Systems are Insufficient without Good Explanationscited by 0
  3. 2025MedicalPatchNet: A Patch-Based Self-Explainable AI Architecture for Chest X-ray Classificationcited by 0
  4. 2025SX-GeoTree: Self-eXplaining Geospatial Regression Tree Incorporating the Spatial Similarity of Feature Attributionscited by 0
  5. 2026UNBOX: Unveiling Black-box visual models with Natural-languagecited by 0
  6. 2026Comparing Post-Hoc Explainable AI Methods for Interpreting Black-Box EEG Models in Depression Detectioncited by 0