mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AsEP: Benchmarking Deep Learning Methods for Antibody-specific Epitope Prediction

arXiv 2407.18184 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2024cs.LGcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Epitope identification is vital for antibody design yet challenging due to the inherent variability in antibodies. While many deep learning methods have been developed for general protein binding site prediction tasks, whether they work for epitope prediction remains an understudied research question. The challenge is also heightened by the lack of a consistent evaluation pipeline with sufficient dataset size and epitope diversity. We introduce a filtered antibody-antigen complex structure dataset, AsEP (Antibody-specific Epitope Prediction). AsEP is the largest of its kind and provides clustered epitope groups, allowing the community to develop and test novel epitope prediction methods and evaluate their generalisability. AsEP comes with an easy-to-use interface in Python and pre-built graph representations of each antibody-antigen complex while also supporting customizable embedding methods. Using this new dataset, we benchmark several representative general protein-binding site prediction methods and find that their performances fall short of expectations for epitope prediction. To address this, we propose a novel method, WALLE, which leverages both unstructured modeling from protein language models and structural modeling from graph neural networks. WALLE demonstrate up to 3-10X performance improvement over the baseline methods. Our empirical findings suggest that epitope prediction benefits from combining sequential features provided by language models with geometrical information from graph representations. This provides a guideline for future epitope prediction method design. In addition, we reformulate the task as bipartite link prediction, allowing convenient model performance attribution and interpretability. We open source our data and code at https://github.com/biochunan/AsEP-dataset.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2024.

Builds on

18 of 73 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
  2. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
  3. 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
  4. 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
  5. 2017Modeling Relational Data with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 1,694
  6. 2016Complex Embeddings for Simple Link Predictioncited by 902
  7. 2018Link Prediction Based on Graph Neural Networkscited by 832
  8. 2018BOHB: Robust and Efficient Hyperparameter Optimization at Scalecited by 470
  9. 2021Neural Bellman-Ford Networks: A General Graph Neural Network Framework for Link Predictioncited by 275
  10. 2015A Review of Relational Machine Learning for Knowledge Graphscited by 265
  11. 2019Inductive Relation Prediction by Subgraph Reasoningcited by 239
  12. 2019Relational Pooling for Graph Representationscited by 150
6 more
  1. 2021Deciphering antibody affinity maturation with language models and weakly supervised learningcited by 53
  2. 2023Improving Language Plasticity via Pretraining with Active Forgettingcited by 43
  3. 2021Relation Prediction as an Auxiliary Training Objective for Improving Multi-Relational Graph Representationscited by 37
  4. 2024Antigen-Specific Antibody Design via Direct Energy-based Preference Optimizationcited by 30
  5. 2022ReFactor GNNs: Revisiting Factorisation-based Models from a Message-Passing Perspectivecited by 12
  6. 2021Neural message passing for joint paratope-epitope predictioncited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 6.

8 papers.