mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Are Large Language Models Possible to Conduct Cognitive Behavioral Therapy?

arXiv 2407.17730 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2024cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In contemporary society, the issue of psychological health has become increasingly prominent, characterized by the diversification, complexity, and universality of mental disorders. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), currently the most influential and clinically effective psychological treatment method with no side effects, has limited coverage and poor quality in most countries. In recent years, researches on the recognition and intervention of emotional disorders using large language models (LLMs) have been validated, providing new possibilities for psychological assistance therapy. However, are LLMs truly possible to conduct cognitive behavioral therapy? Many concerns have been raised by mental health experts regarding the use of LLMs for therapy. Seeking to answer this question, we collected real CBT corpus from online video websites, designed and conducted a targeted automatic evaluation framework involving the evaluation of emotion tendency of generated text, structured dialogue pattern and proactive inquiry ability. For emotion tendency, we calculate the emotion tendency score of the CBT dialogue text generated by each model. For structured dialogue pattern, we use a diverse range of automatic evaluation metrics to compare speaking style, the ability to maintain consistency of topic and the use of technology in CBT between different models . As for inquiring to guide the patient, we utilize PQA (Proactive Questioning Ability) metric. We also evaluated the CBT ability of the LLM after integrating a CBT knowledge base to explore the help of introducing additional knowledge to enhance the model's CBT counseling ability. Four LLM variants with excellent performance on natural language processing are evaluated, and the experimental result shows the great potential of LLMs in psychological counseling realm, especially after combining with other technological means.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 15 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2024.

Builds on

15 of 39 references.

References · 15

  1. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  2. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  3. 2023A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Modelscited by 1,242
  4. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  5. 2015A Diversity-Promoting Objective Function for Neural Conversation Modelscited by 1,077
  6. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
  7. 2023Siren's Song in the AI Ocean: A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Modelscited by 698
  8. 2022Large Language Models Struggle to Learn Long-Tail Knowledgecited by 458
  9. 2024Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Surveycited by 354
  10. 2020A Survey of Evaluation Metrics Used for NLG Systemscited by 164
  11. 2023SoulChat: Improving LLMs' Empathy, Listening, and Comfort Abilities through Fine-tuning with Multi-turn Empathy Conversationscited by 110
  12. 2023BianQue: Balancing the Questioning and Suggestion Ability of Health LLMs with Multi-turn Health Conversations Polished by ChatGPTcited by 65
3 more
  1. 2023SMILE: Single-turn to Multi-turn Inclusive Language Expansion via ChatGPT for Mental Health Supportcited by 46
  2. 2023Knowledge-enhanced Mixed-initiative Dialogue System for Emotional Support Conversationscited by 41
  3. 2024We Care: Multimodal Depression Detection and Knowledge Infused Mental Health Therapeutic Response Generationcited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.