Fine-Tuning Open-Weight Language Models to Deliver Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Depression: A Feasibility Study
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) is a well-established, evidence-based treatment for Major Depressive Disorder. Unfortunately, there exist significant barriers to individuals accessing CBT, including cost, scarcity of therapists and stigma. This study explores the feasibility of fine-tuning small open weight large language models (LLMs) to deliver CBT for depression. Using synthetic CBT transcripts generated by the Nous Research fine-tune of Llama 3.1 405b, we fine-tuned three models: Mistral 7b v0.3, Qwen 2.5 7b, and Llama 3.1 8b. CBT fidelity was evaluated through a modified Cognitive Therapy Rating Scale (CTRS). All fine-tuned models were compared against each other, as well as their instruct-tuned variants. Simulated patient transcripts were generated for the purpose of evaluating model performance, with the instruct and CBT-tuned models acting as the therapist and DeepSeek-V2.5 acting as the patient. These simulated transcripts were evaluated on a modified CTRS by Gemini 1.5 Pro-002. Our findings demonstrated that the CBT-tuned models significantly outperformed their instruct-tuned counterparts, with an average improvement of 11.33 points (p < 0.001) on total CTRS score. Llama 3.1 8b had the strongest performance (mean CTRS score 67.86 +/- 7.24), followed by Qwen 2.5 7b (64.28 +/- 9.55) and Mistral 7b v0.3 (64.17 +/- 9.79), with these differences between models being statistically significant. The CBT-tuned models were competent in implementing core CBT techniques and providing empathetic responses, however, there were limitations observed in agenda adherence, exploration depth and long-context coherence. This study establishes that CBT specific fine-tuning can effectively encode therapeutic competencies in small LLMs, though significant technical and ethical considerations must be resolved prior to clinical deployment.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Nov 2024.
Builds on
19 of 53 references.
References · 19
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,486
- 2023QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMscited by 3,388
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,197
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,123
- 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,972
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,102
- 2024DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Modelcited by 1,115
- 2024Hallucination is Inevitable: An Innate Limitation of Large Language Modelscited by 331
- 2024Same Task, More Tokens: the Impact of Input Length on the Reasoning Performance of Large Language Modelscited by 151
- 2024CBT-LLM: A Chinese Large Language Model for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy-based Mental Health Question Answeringcited by 45
- 2024Hermes 3 Technical Reportcited by 34
- 2024How Numerical Precision Affects Arithmetical Reasoning Capabilities of LLMscited by 24
7 more
- 2024Exploring the Frontiers of LLMs in Psychological Applications: A Comprehensive Reviewcited by 17
- 2021Automated Quality Assessment of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Sessions Through Highly Contextualized Language Representationscited by 13
- 2024Response Generation for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy with Large Language Models: Comparative Study with Socratic Questioningcited by 8
- 2024LLM-Powered Socially Assistive Robot-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Exercises: an Exploratory Study with University Studentscited by 6
- 2024Are Large Language Models Possible to Conduct Cognitive Behavioral Therapy?cited by 2
- 2024A Generic Review of Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Cognitive Behavioral Therapycited by 2
- 2024No General Code of Ethics for All: Ethical Considerations in Human-bot Psycho-counselingcited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.