Thompson Sampling Itself is Differentially Private
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work we first show that the classical Thompson sampling algorithm for multi-arm bandits is differentially private as-is, without any modification. We provide per-round privacy guarantees as a function of problem parameters and show composition over T rounds; since the algorithm is unchanged, existing O(√NTlog N) regret bounds still hold and there is no loss in performance due to privacy. We then show that simple modifications -- such as pre-pulling all arms a fixed number of times, increasing the sampling variance -- can provide tighter privacy guarantees. We again provide privacy guarantees that now depend on the new parameters introduced in the modification, which allows the analyst to tune the privacy guarantee as desired. We also provide a novel regret analysis for this new algorithm, and show how the new parameters also impact expected regret. Finally, we empirically validate and illustrate our theoretical findings in two parameter regimes and demonstrate that tuning the new parameters substantially improve the privacy-regret tradeoff.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jul 2024.
Builds on
9 of 37 references.
References · 9
- 2017A Tutorial on Thompson Samplingcited by 420
- 2018Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 78
- 2015Algorithms for Differentially Private Multi-Armed Banditscited by 44
- 2013Thompson Sampling for Complex Bandit Problemscited by 43
- 2019An Optimal Private Stochastic-MAB Algorithm Based on an Optimal Private Stopping Rulecited by 37
- 2019Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Network Optimization in Unknown Environmentscited by 7
- 2020Variable Selection via Thompson Samplingcited by 7
- 2016The Possibilities and Limitations of Private Prediction Marketscited by 2
- 2021Near-Optimal Algorithms for Differentially Private Online Learning in a Stochastic Environmentcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025Differentially Private Hyperparameter Tuning using Local Bayesian Optimizationcited by 0
- 2025Connecting Thompson Sampling and UCB: Towards More Efficient Trade-offs Between Privacy and Regretcited by 0
- 2026Randomized Least Squares Value Iteration itself is Joint Differentially Privatecited by 0
- 2026Differential Privacy of Gaussian Process Posterior Samplingcited by 0
- 2026Differential Privacy of Gaussian Process Posterior Sampling16 Jun 2026
- 2026Randomized Least Squares Value Iteration itself is Joint Differentially Private1 Jun 2026
- 2025Connecting Thompson Sampling and UCB: Towards More Efficient Trade-offs Between Privacy and Regret5 May 2025
- 2025Differentially Private Hyperparameter Tuning using Local Bayesian Optimization9 Feb 2025