Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Network Optimization in Unknown Environments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Influence maximization, adaptive routing, and dynamic spectrum allocation all require choosing the right action from a large set of alternatives. Thanks to the advances in combinatorial optimization, these and many similar problems can be efficiently solved given an environment with known stochasticity. In this paper, we take this one step further and focus on combinatorial optimization in unknown environments. We consider a very general learning framework called combinatorial multi-armed bandit with probabilistically triggered arms and a very powerful Bayesian algorithm called Combinatorial Thompson Sampling (CTS). Under the semi-bandit feedback model and assuming access to an oracle without knowing the expected base arm outcomes beforehand, we show that when the expected reward is Lipschitz continuous in the expected base arm outcomes CTS achieves O(sumi =1mlog T/(piDeltai)) regret and O(maxmathbbE[m√Tlog T/p^*],mathbbE[m2/p^*]) Bayesian regret, where m denotes the number of base arms, pi and Deltai denote the minimum non-zero triggering probability and the minimum suboptimality gap of base arm i respectively, T denotes the time horizon, and p^* denotes the overall minimum non-zero triggering probability. We also show that when the expected reward satisfies the triggering probability modulated Lipschitz continuity, CTS achieves O(maxm√Tlog T,m2) Bayesian regret, and when triggering probabilities are non-zero for all base arms, CTS achieves O(1/p^*log(1/p^*)) regret independent of the time horizon. Finally, we numerically compare CTS with algorithms based on upper confidence bounds in several networking problems and show that CTS outperforms these algorithms by at least an order of magnitude in majority of the cases.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2019.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Thompson Sampling Itself is Differentially Privatecited by 4
- 2024Adaptive Experiment Design with Synthetic Controlscited by 2
- 2023Cost-Efficient Online Decision Making: A Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Approachcited by 1
- 2023Online Influence Maximization: Concept and Algorithmcited by 0
- 2025Bandits with Anytime Knapsackscited by 0
- 2026Multi-User mmWave Beam and Rate Adaptation via Combinatorial Satisficing Banditscited by 0
- 2026Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Combinatorial Thompson Sampling in Sleeping Semi-Banditscited by 0
- 2026Worst-Case Regret Bounds for Combinatorial Thompson Sampling in Sleeping Semi-Bandits10 May 2026
- 2026Multi-User mmWave Beam and Rate Adaptation via Combinatorial Satisficing Bandits16 Apr 2026
- 2025Bandits with Anytime Knapsacks30 Jan 2025
- 2024Thompson Sampling Itself is Differentially Private20 Jul 2024
- 2024Adaptive Experiment Design with Synthetic Controls30 Jan 2024
- 2023Online Influence Maximization: Concept and Algorithm30 Nov 2023
- 2023Cost-Efficient Online Decision Making: A Combinatorial Multi-Armed Bandit Approach21 Aug 2023