mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Connecting Thompson Sampling and UCB: Towards More Efficient Trade-offs Between Privacy and Regret

arXiv 2505.02383 ↗First posted 5 May 2025cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We address differentially private stochastic bandit problems from the angles of exploring the deep connections among Thompson Sampling with Gaussian priors, Gaussian mechanisms, and Gaussian differential privacy (GDP). We propose DP-TS-UCB, a novel parametrized private bandit algorithm that enables to trade off privacy and regret. DP-TS-UCB satisfies tildeO left(T0.25(1-α)right)-GDP and enjoys an O left(Klnα+1(T)/Delta right) regret bound, where α ∈ [0,1] controls the trade-off between privacy and regret. Theoretically, our DP-TS-UCB relies on anti-concentration bounds of Gaussian distributions and links exploration mechanisms in Thompson Sampling-based algorithms and Upper Confidence Bound-based algorithms, which may be of independent interest.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2025.

Builds on

7 of 27 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018Differentially Private Contextual Linear Banditscited by 82
  2. 2019An Optimal Private Stochastic-MAB Algorithm Based on an Optimal Private Stopping Rulecited by 37
  3. 2020MOTS: Minimax Optimal Thompson Samplingcited by 28
  4. 2022When Privacy Meets Partial Information: A Refined Analysis of Differentially Private Banditscited by 28
  5. 2021Maillard Sampling: Boltzmann Exploration Done Optimallycited by 13
  6. 2022Finite-Time Regret of Thompson Sampling Algorithms for Exponential Family Multi-Armed Banditscited by 11
  7. 2024Thompson Sampling Itself is Differentially Privatecited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.