Towards consistency of rule-based explainer and black box model -- fusion of rule induction and XAI-based feature importance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rule-based models offer a human-understandable representation, i.e. they are interpretable. For this reason, they are used to explain the decisions of non-interpretable complex models, referred to as black box models. The generation of such explanations involves the approximation of a black box model by a rule-based model. To date, however, it has not been investigated whether the rule-based model makes decisions in the same way as the black box model it approximates. Decision making in the same way is understood in this work as the consistency of decisions and the consistency of the most important attributes used for decision making. This study proposes a novel approach ensuring that the rule-based surrogate model mimics the performance of the black box model. The proposed solution performs an explanation fusion involving rule generation and taking into account the feature importance determined by the selected XAI methods for the black box model being explained. The result of the method can be both global and local rule-based explanations. The quality of the proposed solution was verified by extensive analysis on 30 tabular benchmark datasets representing classification problems. Evaluation included comparison with the reference method and an illustrative case study. In addition, the paper discusses the possible pathways for the application of the rule-based approach in XAI and how rule-based explanations, including the proposed method, meet the user perspective and requirements for both content and presentation. The software created and a detailed report containing the full experimental results are available on the GitHub repository (https://github.com/ruleminer/FI-rules4XAI ).
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jul 2024.
Builds on
22 of 66 references.
References · 22
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
- 2016European Union regulations on algorithmic decision-making and a "right to explanation"cited by 344
- 2022From Anecdotal Evidence to Quantitative Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review on Evaluating Explainable AIcited by 302
- 2020GraphLIME: Local Interpretable Model Explanations for Graph Neural Networkscited by 209
- 2020A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processingcited by 206
- 2021Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysiscited by 147
- 2021Explainable AI (XAI): A Systematic Meta-Survey of Current Challenges and Future Opportunitiescited by 125
- 2019Asymmetric Shapley values: incorporating causal knowledge into model-agnostic explainabilitycited by 114
- 2018Boolean Decision Rules via Column Generationcited by 80
- 2018RuleMatrix: Visualizing and Understanding Classifiers with Rulescited by 62
10 more
- 2021S-LIME: Stabilized-LIME for Model Explanationcited by 52
- 2020Shapley Flow: A Graph-based Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 51
- 2019Evaluating Explanation Methods for Deep Learning in Securitycited by 38
- 2024Explainable Predictive Maintenance: A Survey of Current Methods, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 10
- 2023Efficient learning of large sets of locally optimal classification rulescited by 7
- 2019RuleKit: A Comprehensive Suite for Rule-Based Learningcited by 6
- 2018GuideR: a guided separate-and-conquer rule learning in classification, regression, and survival settingscited by 5
- 2018Rule induction for global explanation of trained modelscited by 5
- 2023Explainable AI using expressive Boolean formulascited by 2
- 2023A Voting Approach for Explainable Classification with Rule Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
- 2025Tuning for Trustworthiness -- Balancing Performance and Explanation Consistency in Neural Network Optimizationcited by 0
- 2026Rules or Weights? Comparing User Understanding of Explainable AI Techniques with the Cognitive XAI-Adaptive Modelcited by 0
- 2026PREF-XAI: Preference-Based Personalized Rule Explanations of Black-Box Machine Learning Modelscited by 0
- 2026PREF-XAI: Preference-Based Personalized Rule Explanations of Black-Box Machine Learning Models21 Apr 2026
- 2026Rules or Weights? Comparing User Understanding of Explainable AI Techniques with the Cognitive XAI-Adaptive Model23 Feb 2026
- 2025Tuning for Trustworthiness -- Balancing Performance and Explanation Consistency in Neural Network Optimization12 May 2025