A Comprehensive Sustainable Framework for Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In financial applications, regulations or best practices often lead to specific requirements in machine learning relating to four key pillars: fairness, privacy, interpretability and greenhouse gas emissions. These all sit in the broader context of sustainability in AI, an emerging practical AI topic. However, although these pillars have been individually addressed by past literature, none of these works have considered all the pillars. There are inherent trade-offs between each of the pillars (for example, accuracy vs fairness or accuracy vs privacy), making it even more important to consider them together. This paper outlines a new framework for Sustainable Machine Learning and proposes FPIG, a general AI pipeline that allows for these critical topics to be considered simultaneously to learn the trade-offs between the pillars better. Based on the FPIG framework, we propose a meta-learning algorithm to estimate the four key pillars given a dataset summary, model architecture, and hyperparameters before model training. This algorithm allows users to select the optimal model architecture for a given dataset and a given set of user requirements on the pillars. We illustrate the trade-offs under the FPIG model on three classical datasets and demonstrate the meta-learning approach with an example of real-world datasets and models with different interpretability, showcasing how it can aid model selection.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jul 2024.
Builds on
16 of 60 references.
References · 16
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,242
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2016Fair prediction with disparate impact: A study of bias in recidivism prediction instrumentscited by 671
- 2016Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scorescited by 582
- 2017Fairness in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments: The State of the Artcited by 315
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 246
- 2020GS-WGAN: A Gradient-Sanitized Approach for Learning Differentially Private Generatorscited by 117
- 2023Differentially Private Synthetic Data via Foundation Model APIs 1: Imagescited by 63
4 more
- 2019Energy Usage Reports: Environmental awareness as part of algorithmic accountabilitycited by 43
- 2022Private Synthetic Data for Multitask Learning and Marginal Queriescited by 35
- 2018OBOE: Collaborative Filtering for AutoML Model Selectioncited by 31
- 2018Learning Scene Gist with Convolutional Neural Networks to Improve Object Recognitioncited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.