Seq-to-Final: A Benchmark for Tuning from Sequential Distributions to a Final Time Point
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Distribution shift over time occurs in many settings. Leveraging historical data is necessary to learn a model for the last time point when limited data is available in the final period, yet few methods have been developed specifically for this purpose. In this work, we construct a benchmark with different sequences of synthetic shifts to evaluate the effectiveness of 3 classes of methods that 1) learn from all data without adapting to the final period, 2) learn from historical data with no regard to the sequential nature and then adapt to the final period, and 3) leverage the sequential nature of historical data when tailoring a model to the final period. We call this benchmark Seq-to-Final to highlight the focus on using a sequence of time periods to learn a model for the final time point. Our synthetic benchmark allows users to construct sequences with different types of shift and compare different methods. We focus on image classification tasks using CIFAR-10 and CIFAR-100 as the base images for the synthetic sequences. We also evaluate the same methods on the Portraits dataset to explore the relevance to real-world shifts over time. Finally, we create a visualization to contrast the initializations and updates from different methods at the final time step. Our results suggest that, for the sequences in our benchmark, methods that disregard the sequential structure and adapt to the final time point tend to perform well. The approaches we evaluate that leverage the sequential nature do not offer any improvement. We hope that this benchmark will inspire the development of new algorithms that are better at leveraging sequential historical data or a deeper understanding of why methods that disregard the sequential nature are able to perform well.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 Jul 2024.
Builds on
24 of 33 references.
References · 24
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016Overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networkscited by 4,718
- 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,832
- 2022Model soups: averaging weights of multiple fine-tuned models improves accuracy without increasing inference timecited by 1,366
- 2018Efficient Lifelong Learning with A-GEMcited by 1,044
- 2022Few-Shot Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning is Better and Cheaper than In-Context Learningcited by 886
- 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 863
- 2021Generalizing to Unseen Domains: A Survey on Domain Generalizationcited by 762
- 2019Large Scale Incremental Learningcited by 727
- 2022Fine-Tuning can Distort Pretrained Features and Underperform Out-of-Distributioncited by 722
12 more
- 2013Domain Generalization via Invariant Feature Representationcited by 622
- 2018End-to-End Incremental Learningcited by 596
- 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
- 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
- 2022Surgical Fine-Tuning Improves Adaptation to Distribution Shiftscited by 205
- 2018Efficient parametrization of multi-domain deep neural networkscited by 168
- 2020Understanding Self-Training for Gradual Domain Adaptationcited by 149
- 2021An Empirical Investigation of the Role of Pre-training in Lifelong Learningcited by 134
- 2022The CLEAR Benchmark: Continual LEArning on Real-World Imagerycited by 92
- 2022Wild-Time: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shift over Timecited by 85
- 2015A Century of Portraits: A Visual Historical Record of American High School Yearbookscited by 54
- 2021Learning where to learn: Gradient sparsity in meta and continual learningcited by 33
Built on by
Not cited yet.