Randomness Helps Rigor: A Probabilistic Learning Rate Scheduler Bridging Theory and Deep Learning Practice
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning rate schedulers have shown great success in speeding up the convergence of learning algorithms in practice. However, their convergence to a minimum has not been proven theoretically. This difficulty mainly arises from the fact that, while traditional convergence analysis prescribes to monotonically decreasing (or constant) learning rates, schedulers opt for rates that often increase and decrease through the training epochs. In this work, we aim to bridge the gap by proposing a probabilistic learning rate scheduler (PLRS) that does not conform to the monotonically decreasing condition, with provable convergence guarantees. To cement the relevance and utility of our work in modern day applications, we show experimental results on deep neural network architectures such as ResNet, WRN, VGG, and DenseNet on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny ImageNet datasets. We show that PLRS performs as well as or better than existing state-of-the-art learning rate schedulers in terms of convergence as well as accuracy. For example, while training ResNet-110 on the CIFAR-100 dataset, we outperform the state-of-the-art knee scheduler by 1.56% in terms of classification accuracy. Furthermore, on the Tiny ImageNet dataset using ResNet-50 architecture, we show a significantly more stable convergence than the cosine scheduler and a better classification accuracy than the existing schedulers.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 10 Jul 2024.
Builds on
20 of 33 references.
References · 20
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
- 2021Emerging Properties in Self-Supervised Vision Transformerscited by 6,893
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
- 2016SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restartscited by 4,993
- 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2021Restormer: Efficient Transformer for High-Resolution Image Restorationcited by 1,618
- 2015Cyclical Learning Rates for Training Neural Networkscited by 627
- 2019Lower Bounds for Non-Convex Stochastic Optimizationcited by 303
- 2014Identifying and attacking the saddle point problem in high-dimensional non-convex optimizationcited by 286
- 2017How to Escape Saddle Points Efficientlycited by 284
8 more
- 2015Escaping From Saddle Points --- Online Stochastic Gradient for Tensor Decompositioncited by 241
- 2020Understanding and Improving Fast Adversarial Trainingcited by 213
- 2020Towards Theoretically Understanding Why SGD Generalizes Better Than ADAM in Deep Learningcited by 125
- 2020Lipschitz constant estimation of Neural Networks via sparse polynomial optimizationcited by 87
- 2017A Hitting Time Analysis of Stochastic Gradient Langevin Dynamicscited by 70
- 2020Wide-minima Density Hypothesis and the Explore-Exploit Learning Rate Schedulecited by 25
- 2019Towards Robust ResNet: A Small Step but A Giant Leapcited by 15
- 2020Tune smarter not harder: A principled approach to tuning learning rates for shallow netscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.