Tracing Back the Malicious Clients in Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Poisoning attacks compromise the training phase of federated learning (FL) such that the learned global model misclassifies attacker-chosen inputs called target inputs. Existing defenses mainly focus on protecting the training phase of FL such that the learnt global model is poison free. However, these defenses often achieve limited effectiveness when the clients' local training data is highly non-iid or the number of malicious clients is large, as confirmed in our experiments. In this work, we propose FLForensics, the first poison-forensics method for FL. FLForensics complements existing training-phase defenses. In particular, when training-phase defenses fail and a poisoned global model is deployed, FLForensics aims to trace back the malicious clients that performed the poisoning attack after a misclassified target input is identified. We theoretically show that FLForensics can accurately distinguish between benign and malicious clients under a formal definition of poisoning attack. Moreover, we empirically show the effectiveness of FLForensics at tracing back both existing and adaptive poisoning attacks on five benchmark datasets.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 Jul 2024.
Builds on
30 of 47 references.
References · 30
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
- 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
- 2021Convex optimizationcited by 2,479
- 2017BadNets: Identifying Vulnerabilities in the Machine Learning Model Supply Chaincited by 1,052
- 2018How To Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 745
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 698
- 2018Poison Frogs! Targeted Clean-Label Poisoning Attacks on Neural Networkscited by 500
- 2019Local Model Poisoning Attacks to Byzantine-Robust Federated Learningcited by 479
- 2019STRIP: A Defence Against Trojan Attacks on Deep Neural Networkscited by 437
- 2022Dataset Distillation by Matching Training Trajectoriescited by 437
- 2020FLTrust: Byzantine-robust Federated Learning via Trust Bootstrappingcited by 330
18 more
- 2020Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 307
- 2019A Little Is Enough: Circumventing Defenses For Distributed Learningcited by 285
- 2018SentiNet: Detecting Localized Universal Attacks Against Deep Learning Systemscited by 148
- 2020Dynamic Backdoor Attacks Against Machine Learning Modelscited by 147
- 2022FLDetector: Defending Federated Learning Against Model Poisoning Attacks via Detecting Malicious Clientscited by 119
- 2022MPAF: Model Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning based on Fake Clientscited by 65
- 2022The "Beatrix'' Resurrections: Robust Backdoor Detection via Gram Matricescited by 62
- 2021Provably Secure Federated Learning against Malicious Clientscited by 60
- 2022FedRecover: Recovering from Poisoning Attacks in Federated Learning using Historical Informationcited by 53
- 2024Byzantine-Robust Decentralized Federated Learningcited by 47
- 2021Poison Forensics: Traceback of Data Poisoning Attacks in Neural Networkscited by 37
- 2022Identifying a Training-Set Attack's Target Using Renormalized Influence Estimationcited by 32
- 2022FLCert: Provably Secure Federated Learning against Poisoning Attackscited by 29
- 2022AFLGuard: Byzantine-robust Asynchronous Federated Learningcited by 29
- 2024Model Poisoning Attacks to Federated Learning via Multi-Round Consistencycited by 18
- 2023Unlocking the Potential of Federated Learning: The Symphony of Dataset Distillation via Deep Generative Latentscited by 16
- 2023BEAGLE: Forensics of Deep Learning Backdoor Attack for Better Defensecited by 15
- 2021Data Poisoning Attacks and Defenses to Crowdsourcing Systemscited by 12
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 4.
6 papers.
- 2025Who Taught the Lie? Responsibility Attribution for Poisoned Knowledge in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 12
- 2026Beware What You Autocomplete: Forensic Attribution of Backdoored Code Completionscited by 4
- 2024UTrace: Poisoning Forensics for Private Collaborative Learningcited by 3
- 2026Who Broke the System? Failure Localization in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systemscited by 1
- 2026FedAttr: Towards Privacy-preserving Client-Level Attribution in Federated LLM Fine-tuningcited by 0
- 2026On the Fragility of Data Attribution When Learning Is Distributedcited by 0
- 2026Beware What You Autocomplete: Forensic Attribution of Backdoored Code Completions9 Jul 2026
- 2026Who Broke the System? Failure Localization in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems8 Jul 2026
- 2026On the Fragility of Data Attribution When Learning Is Distributed15 May 2026
- 2026FedAttr: Towards Privacy-preserving Client-Level Attribution in Federated LLM Fine-tuning7 May 2026
- 2025Who Taught the Lie? Responsibility Attribution for Poisoned Knowledge in Retrieval-Augmented Generation17 Sep 2025
- 2024UTrace: Poisoning Forensics for Private Collaborative Learning23 Sep 2024