mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Randomized Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Bayesian Data Assimilation

arXiv 2407.04617 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2024cs.LGcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We propose a randomized physics-informed neural network (PINN) or rPINN method for uncertainty quantification in inverse partial differential equation (PDE) problems with noisy data. This method is used to quantify uncertainty in the inverse PDE PINN solutions. Recently, the Bayesian PINN (BPINN) method was proposed, where the posterior distribution of the PINN parameters was formulated using the Bayes' theorem and sampled using approximate inference methods such as the Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (HMC) and variational inference (VI) methods. In this work, we demonstrate that HMC fails to converge for non-linear inverse PDE problems. As an alternative to HMC, we sample the distribution by solving the stochastic optimization problem obtained by randomizing the PINN loss function. The effectiveness of the rPINN method is tested for linear and non-linear Poisson equations, and the diffusion equation with a high-dimensional space-dependent diffusion coefficient. The rPINN method provides informative distributions for all considered problems. For the linear Poisson equation, HMC and rPINN produce similar distributions, but rPINN is on average 27 times faster than HMC. For the non-linear Poison and diffusion equations, the HMC method fails to converge because a single HMC chain cannot sample multiple modes of the posterior distribution of the PINN parameters in a reasonable amount of time.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2024.

Builds on

16 of 40 references.

References · 16

  1. 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
  2. 2016Variational Inference: A Review for Statisticianscited by 1,466
  3. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 846
  4. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  5. 2018Loss Surfaces, Mode Connectivity, and Fast Ensembling of DNNscited by 585
  6. 2016Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithmcited by 498
  7. 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 329
  8. 2021What Are Bayesian Neural Network Posteriors Really Like?cited by 307
  9. 2017A Conceptual Introduction to Hamiltonian Monte Carlocited by 207
  10. 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 169
  11. 2020Integrating Scientific Knowledge with Machine Learning for Engineering and Environmental Systemscited by 160
  12. 2019Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Multiphysics Data Assimilation with Application to Subsurface Transportcited by 60
4 more
  1. 2019Quality of Uncertainty Quantification for Bayesian Neural Network Inferencecited by 58
  2. 2022Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for real-world nonlinear dynamical systemscited by 54
  3. 2022Physics-Informed Neural Network Method for Parabolic Differential Equations with Sharply Perturbed Initial Conditionscited by 7
  4. 2023Randomized Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Uncertainty Quantification in High-Dimensional Inverse Problemscited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 4.

7 papers.