mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Strengthening Structural Inductive Biases by Pre-training to Perform Syntactic Transformations

arXiv 2407.04543 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2024cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Models need appropriate inductive biases to effectively learn from small amounts of data and generalize systematically outside of the training distribution. While Transformers are highly versatile and powerful, they can still benefit from enhanced structural inductive biases for seq2seq tasks, especially those involving syntactic transformations, such as converting active to passive voice or semantic parsing. In this paper, we propose to strengthen the structural inductive bias of a Transformer by intermediate pre-training to perform synthetically generated syntactic transformations of dependency trees given a description of the transformation. Our experiments confirm that this helps with few-shot learning of syntactic tasks such as chunking, and also improves structural generalization for semantic parsing. Our analysis shows that the intermediate pre-training leads to attention heads that keep track of which syntactic transformation needs to be applied to which token, and that the model can leverage these attention heads on downstream tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 30 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2024.

Builds on

30 of 55 references.

References · 30

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  2. 2017Model-Agnostic Meta-Learning for Fast Adaptation of Deep Networkscited by 4,897
  3. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,799
  4. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  5. 2016Google's Multilingual Neural Machine Translation System: Enabling Zero-Shot Translationcited by 469
  6. 2019Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Datacited by 284
  7. 2019Compositionality decomposed: how do neural networks generalise?cited by 265
  8. 2020COGS: A Compositional Generalization Challenge Based on Semantic Interpretationcited by 263
  9. 2019Good-Enough Compositional Data Augmentationcited by 158
  10. 2020Compositional Generalization in Semantic Parsing: Pre-training vs. Specialized Architecturescited by 95
  11. 2021Trankit: A Light-Weight Transformer-based Toolkit for Multilingual Natural Language Processingcited by 68
  12. 2021Meta-Learning to Compositionally Generalizecited by 62
18 more
  1. 2023Injecting structural hints: Using language models to study inductive biases in language learningcited by 35
  2. 2021StylePTB: A Compositional Benchmark for Fine-grained Controllable Text Style Transfercited by 34
  3. 2021Learning Algebraic Recombination for Compositional Generalizationcited by 31
  4. 2020Improving AMR Parsing with Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-trainingcited by 30
  5. 2021Sequence-to-Sequence Learning with Latent Neural Grammarscited by 30
  6. 2022Coloring the Blank Slate: Pre-training Imparts a Hierarchical Inductive Bias to Sequence-to-sequence Modelscited by 28
  7. 2018Syntactic Scaffolds for Semantic Structurescited by 27
  8. 2022Structural generalization is hard for sequence-to-sequence modelscited by 24
  9. 2023SLOG: A Structural Generalization Benchmark for Semantic Parsingcited by 22
  10. 2022CrossRE: A Cross-Domain Dataset for Relation Extractioncited by 21
  11. 2018AMR Dependency Parsing with a Typed Semantic Algebracited by 17
  12. 2022SUBS: Subtree Substitution for Compositional Semantic Parsingcited by 16
  13. 2023Learning to Substitute Spans towards Improving Compositional Generalizationcited by 8
  14. 2023SIP: Injecting a Structural Inductive Bias into a Seq2Seq Model by Simulationcited by 7
  15. 2023Compositional Generalization without Trees using Multiset Tagging and Latent Permutationscited by 5
  16. 2023Structural generalization in COGS: Supertagging is (almost) all you needcited by 4
  17. 2022Translate First Reorder Later: Leveraging Monotonicity in Semantic Parsingcited by 3
  18. 2023Silver Syntax Pre-training for Cross-Domain Relation Extractioncited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

4 papers.