mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Segmenting Medical Images: From UNet to Res-UNet and nnUNet

arXiv 2407.04353 ↗First posted 5 Jul 2024eess.IV cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This study provides a comparative analysis of deep learning models including UNet, Res-UNet, Attention Res-UNet, and nnUNet, and evaluates their performance in brain tumour, polyp, and multi-class heart segmentation tasks. The analysis focuses on precision, accuracy, recall, Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), and Intersection over Union (IoU) to assess their clinical applicability. In brain tumour segmentation, Res-UNet and nnUNet significantly outperformed UNet, with Res-UNet leading in DSC and IoU scores, indicating superior accuracy in tumour delineation. Meanwhile, nnUNet excelled in recall and accuracy, which are crucial for reliable tumour detection in clinical diagnosis and planning. In polyp detection, nnUNet was the most effective, achieving the highest metrics across all categories and proving itself as a reliable diagnostic tool in endoscopy. In the complex task of heart segmentation, Res-UNet and Attention Res-UNet were outstanding in delineating the left ventricle, with Res-UNet also leading in right ventricle segmentation. nnUNet was unmatched in myocardium segmentation, achieving top scores in precision, recall, DSC, and IoU. The conclusion notes that although Res-UNet occasionally outperforms nnUNet in specific metrics, the differences are quite small. Moreover, nnUNet consistently shows superior overall performance across the experiments. Particularly noted for its high recall and accuracy, which are crucial in clinical settings to minimize misdiagnosis and ensure timely treatment, nnUNet's robust performance in crucial metrics across all tested categories establishes it as the most effective model for these varied and complex segmentation tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2024.

Builds on

9 of 45 references.

References · 9

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  3. 2017A Survey on Deep Learning in Medical Image Analysiscited by 1,182
  4. 2017Deep Learning for Medical Image Analysiscited by 399
  5. 2020A review of deep learning in medical imaging: Imaging traits, technology trends, case studies with progress highlights, and future promisescited by 230
  6. 2018An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRIcited by 140
  7. 2019Deep learning for cardiac image segmentation: A reviewcited by 131
  8. 2023Adaptive Context Selection for Polyp Segmentationcited by 47
  9. 2018Polyp Segmentation in Colonoscopy Images Using Fully Convolutional Networkcited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 1.

6 papers.