mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Understanding and Reducing the Class-Dependent Effects of Data Augmentation with A Two-Player Game Approach

arXiv 2407.03146 ↗First posted 31 May 2024cs.CY cs.AI cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Data augmentation is widely applied and has shown its benefits in different machine learning tasks. However, as recently observed, it may have an unfair effect in multi-class classification. While data augmentation generally improves the overall performance (and therefore is beneficial for many classes), it can actually be detrimental for other classes, which can be problematic in some application domains. In this paper, to counteract this phenomenon, we propose CLAM, a CLAss-dependent Multiplicative-weights method. To derive it, we first formulate the training of a classifier as a non-linear optimization problem that aims at simultaneously maximizing the individual class performances and balancing them. By rewriting this optimization problem as an adversarial two-player game, we propose a novel multiplicative weight algorithm, for which we prove the convergence. Interestingly, our formulation also reveals that the class-dependent effects of data augmentation is not due to data augmentation only, but is in fact a general phenomenon. Our empirical results over six datasets demonstrate that the performance of learned classifiers is indeed more fairly distributed over classes, with only limited impact on the average accuracy.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 31 May 2024.

Builds on

23 of 38 references.

References · 23

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  4. 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 585
  5. 2020Image Augmentation Is All You Need: Regularizing Deep Reinforcement Learning from Pixelscited by 573
  6. 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
  7. 2021Mastering Visual Continuous Control: Improved Data-Augmented Reinforcement Learningcited by 359
  8. 2020Are we done with ImageNet?cited by 329
  9. 2020Minimax Pareto Fairness: A Multi Objective Perspectivecited by 152
  10. 2021Stabilizing Deep Q-Learning with ConvNets and Vision Transformers under Data Augmentationcited by 101
  11. 2018A Unified Approach to Quantifying Algorithmic Unfairness: Measuring Individual & Group Unfairness via Inequality Indicescited by 97
  12. 2016Fairness in Reinforcement Learningcited by 93
11 more
  1. 2022Fair Contrastive Learning for Facial Attribute Classificationcited by 71
  2. 2022The Effects of Regularization and Data Augmentation are Class Dependentcited by 67
  3. 2020Learning Fair Policies in Multiobjective (Deep) Reinforcement Learning with Average and Discounted Rewardscited by 60
  4. 2018Fairness Behind a Veil of Ignorance: A Welfare Analysis for Automated Decision Makingcited by 46
  5. 2021Learning Fair Classifiers with Partially Annotated Group Labelscited by 40
  6. 2024A Comprehensive Survey on Data Augmentationcited by 38
  7. 2022Beyond Adult and COMPAS: Fairness in Multi-Class Predictioncited by 16
  8. 2021Tilted Cross Entropy (TCE): Promoting Fairness in Semantic Segmentationcited by 12
  9. 2023Understanding the Detrimental Class-level Effects of Data Augmentationcited by 12
  10. 2020Fair for All: Best-effort Fairness Guarantees for Classificationcited by 8
  11. 2022A Fair Loss Function for Network Pruningcited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.