Unified Anomaly Detection methods on Edge Device using Knowledge Distillation and Quantization
On the map: Knowledge distillation → Detection and dense prediction distillation
Abstract (arXiv)
With the rapid advances in deep learning and smart manufacturing in Industry 4.0, there is an imperative for high-throughput, high-performance, and fully integrated visual inspection systems. Most anomaly detection approaches using defect detection datasets, such as MVTec AD, employ one-class models that require fitting separate models for each class. On the contrary, unified models eliminate the need for fitting separate models for each class and significantly reduce cost and memory requirements. Thus, in this work, we experiment with considering a unified multi-class setup. Our experimental study shows that multi-class models perform at par with one-class models for the standard MVTec AD dataset. Hence, this indicates that there may not be a need to learn separate object/class-wise models when the object classes are significantly different from each other, as is the case of the dataset considered. Furthermore, we have deployed three different unified lightweight architectures on the CPU and an edge device (NVIDIA Jetson Xavier NX). We analyze the quantized multi-class anomaly detection models in terms of latency and memory requirements for deployment on the edge device while comparing quantization-aware training (QAT) and post-training quantization (PTQ) for performance at different precision widths. In addition, we explored two different methods of calibration required in post-training scenarios and show that one of them performs notably better, highlighting its importance for unsupervised tasks. Due to quantization, the performance drop in PTQ is further compensated by QAT, which yields at par performance with the original 32-bit Floating point in two of the models considered.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Detection and dense prediction distillation, one of 12 directions in Knowledge distillation. Builds on 11 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2024.
Builds on
11 of 35 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 10
- 2018Quantizing deep convolutional networks for efficient inference: A whitepapercited by 521
- 2019Uninformed Students: Student-Teacher Anomaly Detection with Discriminative Latent Embeddingscited by 386
- 2022A Unified Model for Multi-class Anomaly Detectioncited by 268
- 2018Improving Unsupervised Defect Segmentation by Applying Structural Similarity to Autoencoderscited by 264
- 2020Patch SVDD: Patch-level SVDD for Anomaly Detection and Segmentationcited by 212
- 2018Latent Space Autoregression for Novelty Detectioncited by 149
- 2021Student-Teacher Feature Pyramid Matching for Anomaly Detectioncited by 146
- 2022MemSeg: A semi-supervised method for image surface defect detection using differences and commonalitiescited by 68
- 2023LafitE: Latent Diffusion Model with Feature Editing for Unsupervised Multi-class Anomaly Detectioncited by 13
- 2018Fast Feature Extraction with CNNs with Pooling Layerscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Efficient Visual Anomaly Detection at the Edge: Enabling Real-Time Industrial Inspection on Resource-Constrained Devices
- 2025Generalist Multi-Class Anomaly Detection via Distillation to Two Heterogeneous Student Networks
- 2025LR-IAD:Mask-Free Industrial Anomaly Detection with Logical Reasoning
- 2024Separating Novel Features for Logical Anomaly Detection: A Straightforward yet Effective Approach
- 2025Detect, Classify, Act: Categorizing Industrial Anomalies with Multi-Modal Large Language Models
- 2024PaSTe: Improving the Efficiency of Visual Anomaly Detection at the Edge
- 2026Edge AI for Automotive Vulnerable Road User Safety: Deployable Detection via Knowledge Distillation
- 2026Multi-AD: Cross-Domain Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Medical and Industrial Applications