mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Enable the Right to be Forgotten with Federated Client Unlearning in Medical Imaging

arXiv 2407.02356 ↗First posted 2 Jul 2024eess.IV cs.CV cs.LGcited by 9

On the map: LLM safety and security → Federated unlearning and poisoning

Abstract (arXiv)

The right to be forgotten, as stated in most data regulations, poses an underexplored challenge in federated learning (FL), leading to the development of federated unlearning (FU). However, current FU approaches often face trade-offs between efficiency, model performance, forgetting efficacy, and privacy preservation. In this paper, we delve into the paradigm of Federated Client Unlearning (FCU) to guarantee a client the right to erase the contribution or the influence, introducing the first FU framework in medical imaging. In the unlearning process of a client, the proposed model-contrastive unlearning marks a pioneering step towards feature-level unlearning, and frequency-guided memory preservation ensures smooth forgetting of local knowledge while maintaining the generalizability of the trained global model, thus avoiding performance compromises and guaranteeing rapid post-training. We evaluated our FCU framework on two public medical image datasets, including Intracranial hemorrhage diagnosis and skin lesion diagnosis, demonstrating that our framework outperformed other state-of-the-art FU frameworks, with an expected speed-up of 10-15 times compared with retraining from scratch. The code and the organized datasets can be found at: https://github.com/dzp2095/FCU.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Federated unlearning and poisoning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 23 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Jul 2024.

Builds on

23 of 35 references.

Closest ancestors · 3

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Federated Unlearning: A Survey on Methods, Design Guidelines, and Evaluation Metrics10 Jan
  2. 2022Federated Unlearning: How to Efficiently Erase a Client in FL?12 Jul
  3. 2022Federated Unlearning with Knowledge Distillation24 Jan

Other references · 20

  1. 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  4. 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
  5. 2019Machine Unlearningcited by 1,020
  6. 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 762
  7. 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 599
  8. 2021FedBN: Federated Learning on Non-IID Features via Local Batch Normalizationcited by 565
  9. 2022Decoupled Knowledge Distillationcited by 380
  10. 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
  11. 2019A Comprehensive Overhaul of Feature Distillationcited by 341
  12. 2023Towards Unbounded Machine Unlearningcited by 261
8 more
  1. 2022Can Bad Teaching Induce Forgetting? Unlearning in Deep Networks using an Incompetent Teachercited by 189
  2. 2021Federated Reconstruction: Partially Local Federated Learningcited by 78
  3. 2022Federated Learning on Heterogeneous and Long-Tailed Data via Classifier Re-Training with Federated Featurescited by 63
  4. 2021Federated Semi-supervised Medical Image Classification via Inter-client Relation Matchingcited by 42
  5. 2021Personalized Retrogress-Resilient Framework for Real-World Medical Federated Learningcited by 25
  6. 2022Knowledge Removal in Sampling-based Bayesian Inferencecited by 20
  7. 2023Client-Level Differential Privacy via Adaptive Intermediary in Federated Medical Imagingcited by 6
  8. 2023Scale Federated Learning for Label Set Mismatch in Medical Image Classificationcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 3; 2026: 6.

9 papers.