mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Dysca: A Dynamic and Scalable Benchmark for Evaluating Perception Ability of LVLMs

arXiv 2406.18849 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2024cs.CVcited by 6

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Currently many benchmarks have been proposed to evaluate the perception ability of the Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). However, most benchmarks conduct questions by selecting images from existing datasets, resulting in the potential data leakage. Besides, these benchmarks merely focus on evaluating LVLMs on the realistic style images and clean scenarios, leaving the multi-stylized images and noisy scenarios unexplored. In response to these challenges, we propose a dynamic and scalable benchmark named Dysca for evaluating LVLMs by leveraging synthesis images. Specifically, we leverage Stable Diffusion and design a rule-based method to dynamically generate novel images, questions and the corresponding answers. We consider 51 kinds of image styles and evaluate the perception capability in 20 subtasks. Moreover, we conduct evaluations under 4 scenarios (i.e., Clean, Corruption, Print Attacking and Adversarial Attacking) and 3 question types (i.e., Multi-choices, True-or-false and Free-form). Thanks to the generative paradigm, Dysca serves as a scalable benchmark for easily adding new subtasks and scenarios. A total of 24 advanced open-source LVLMs and 2 close-source LVLMs are evaluated on Dysca, revealing the drawbacks of current LVLMs. The benchmark is released at https://github.com/Robin-WZQ/Dysca.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in VLM benchmarks and visual reasoning, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 2.

6 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024TUBench: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models on Trustworthiness with Unanswerable Questions
  2. 2023ReForm-Eval: Evaluating Large Vision Language Models via Unified Re-Formulation of Task-Oriented Benchmarks
  3. 2025MVI-Bench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Robustness to Misleading Visual Inputs in LVLMs
  4. 2024AutoBench-V: Can Large Vision-Language Models Benchmark Themselves?
  5. 2023Q-Bench: A Benchmark for General-Purpose Foundation Models on Low-level Vision
  6. 2024Dynamic Multimodal Evaluation with Flexible Complexity by Vision-Language Bootstrapping
  7. 2023LVLM-eHub: A Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models
  8. 2026Benchmarking Deflection and Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Models