Simulating The U.S. Senate: An LLM-Driven Agent Approach to Modeling Legislative Behavior and Bipartisanship
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Social simulation and multi-agent debate
Abstract (arXiv)
This study introduces a novel approach to simulating legislative processes using LLM-driven virtual agents, focusing on the U.S. Senate Intelligence Committee. We developed agents representing individual senators and placed them in simulated committee discussions. The agents demonstrated the ability to engage in realistic debate, provide thoughtful reflections, and find bipartisan solutions under certain conditions. Notably, the simulation also showed promise in modeling shifts towards bipartisanship in response to external perturbations. Our results indicate that this LLM-driven approach could become a valuable tool for understanding and potentially improving legislative processes, supporting a broader pattern of findings highlighting how LLM-based agents can usefully model real-world phenomena. Future works will focus on enhancing agent complexity, expanding the simulation scope, and exploring applications in policy testing and negotiation.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Social simulation and multi-agent debate, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 3 of its 5 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jun 2024.
Builds on
3 of 5 references.
Closest ancestors · 1
Same direction, newest first
Other references · 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 3; 2025: 4; 2026: 2.
9 papers.
- 2024From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agentscited by 76
- 2024Social Science Meets LLMs: How Reliable Are Large Language Models in Social Simulations?cited by 26
- 2024A Large-Scale Simulation on Large Language Models for Decision-Making in Political Sciencecited by 9
- 2026LLM Agents in Law: Taxonomy, Applications, and Challengescited by 5
- 2025Evolution in Simulation: AI-Agent School with Dual Memory for High-Fidelity Educational Dynamicscited by 3
- 2025PoliCon: Evaluating LLMs on Achieving Diverse Political Consensus Objectivescited by 2
- 2025Agent-Enhanced Large Language Models for Researching Political Institutionscited by 1
- 2025Artificial Utopia: Simulation and Intelligent Agents for a Democratised Futurecited by 0
- 2026Simulating Organized Group Behavior: New Framework, Benchmark, and Analysiscited by 0
- 2026Simulating Organized Group Behavior: New Framework, Benchmark, and Analysis10 Apr 2026
- 2026LLM Agents in Law: Taxonomy, Applications, and Challenges8 Jan 2026
- 2025Evolution in Simulation: AI-Agent School with Dual Memory for High-Fidelity Educational Dynamics13 Oct 2025
- 2025PoliCon: Evaluating LLMs on Achieving Diverse Political Consensus Objectives26 May 2025
- 2025Agent-Enhanced Large Language Models for Researching Political Institutions14 Mar 2025
- 2025Artificial Utopia: Simulation and Intelligent Agents for a Democratised Future10 Mar 2025
- 2024A Large-Scale Simulation on Large Language Models for Decision-Making in Political Science19 Dec 2024
- 2024From Individual to Society: A Survey on Social Simulation Driven by Large Language Model-based Agents4 Dec 2024
- 2024Social Science Meets LLMs: How Reliable Are Large Language Models in Social Simulations?30 Oct 2024
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025FlockVote: LLM-Empowered Agent-Based Modeling for Simulating U.S. Presidential Elections
- 2024Political Actor Agent: Simulating Legislative System for Roll Call Votes Prediction with Large Language Models
- 2026Digital Pantheon: Simulating and Auditing Coalition Formation with LLM Agents
- 2025Revealing Political Bias in LLMs through Structured Multi-Agent Debate
- 2026ElecTwit: A Framework for Studying Persuasion in Multi-Agent Social Systems
- 2024Modelling Political Coalition Negotiations Using LLM-based Agents
- 2025From Delegates to Trustees: How Optimizing for Long-Term Interests Shapes Bias and Alignment in LLM
- 2023The Wisdom of Partisan Crowds: Comparing Collective Intelligence in Humans and LLM-based Agents