mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CAT: Interpretable Concept-based Taylor Additive Models

arXiv 2406.17931 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2024cs.LGcited by 5

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As an emerging interpretable technique, Generalized Additive Models (GAMs) adopt neural networks to individually learn non-linear functions for each feature, which are then combined through a linear model for final predictions. Although GAMs can explain deep neural networks (DNNs) at the feature level, they require large numbers of model parameters and are prone to overfitting, making them hard to train and scale. Additionally, in real-world datasets with many features, the interpretability of feature-based explanations diminishes for humans. To tackle these issues, recent research has shifted towards concept-based interpretable methods. These approaches try to integrate concept learning as an intermediate step before making predictions, explaining the predictions in terms of human-understandable concepts. However, these methods require domain experts to extensively label concepts with relevant names and their ground-truth values. In response, we propose CAT, a novel interpretable Concept-bAsed Taylor additive model to simply this process. CAT does not have to require domain experts to annotate concepts and their ground-truth values. Instead, it only requires users to simply categorize input features into broad groups, which can be easily accomplished through a quick metadata review. Specifically, CAT first embeds each group of input features into one-dimensional high-level concept representation, and then feeds the concept representations into a new white-box Taylor Neural Network (TaylorNet). The TaylorNet aims to learn the non-linear relationship between the inputs and outputs using polynomials. Evaluation results across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that CAT can outperform or compete with the baselines while reducing the need of extensive model parameters. Importantly, it can explain model predictions through high-level concepts that human can understand.

Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2024.

Builds on

20 of 47 references.

References · 20

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  3. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  4. 2019MaskGAN: Towards Diverse and Interactive Facial Image Manipulationcited by 628
  5. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 616
  6. 2017Interpretation of Neural Networks is Fragilecited by 444
  7. 2019Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methodscited by 443
  8. 2020Neural Additive Models: Interpretable Machine Learning with Neural Netscited by 319
  9. 2018Neural-Symbolic VQA: Disentangling Reasoning from Vision and Language Understandingcited by 304
  10. 2020Concept Whitening for Interpretable Image Recognitioncited by 225
  11. 2016Model-Agnostic Interpretability of Machine Learningcited by 219
  12. 2021Post-hoc Interpretability for Neural NLP: A Surveycited by 156
8 more
  1. 2021Promises and Pitfalls of Black-Box Concept Learning Modelscited by 131
  2. 2020Reliable Post hoc Explanations: Modeling Uncertainty in Explainabilitycited by 125
  3. 2021NODE-GAM: Neural Generalized Additive Model for Interpretable Deep Learningcited by 88
  4. 2022Concept Embedding Models: Beyond the Accuracy-Explainability Trade-Offcited by 61
  5. 2022Neural Basis Models for Interpretabilitycited by 56
  6. 2019Interpretability Beyond Classification Output: Semantic Bottleneck Networkscited by 49
  7. 2019Global and Local Interpretability for Cardiac MRI Classificationcited by 29
  8. 2018Semantic bottleneck for computer vision taskscited by 10

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 4.

5 papers.