mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The GPT-WritingPrompts Dataset: A Comparative Analysis of Character Portrayal in Short Stories

arXiv 2406.16767 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The improved generative capabilities of large language models have made them a powerful tool for creative writing and storytelling. It is therefore important to quantitatively understand the nature of generated stories, and how they differ from human storytelling. We augment the Reddit WritingPrompts dataset with short stories generated by GPT-3.5, given the same prompts. We quantify and compare the emotional and descriptive features of storytelling from both generative processes, human and machine, along a set of six dimensions. We find that generated stories differ significantly from human stories along all six dimensions, and that human and machine generations display similar biases when grouped according to the narrative point-of-view and gender of the main protagonist. We release our dataset and code at https://github.com/KristinHuangg/gpt-writing-prompts.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2024.

Builds on

24 of 45 references.

References · 24

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  4. 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,346
  5. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 3,961
  6. 2018Hierarchical Neural Story Generationcited by 1,182
  7. 2019SpanBERT: Improving Pre-training by Representing and Predicting Spanscited by 832
  8. 2021MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence Frontierscited by 466
  9. 2023TinyStories: How Small Can Language Models Be and Still Speak Coherent English?cited by 425
  10. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 415
  11. 2016A Corpus and Evaluation Framework for Deeper Understanding of Commonsense Storiescited by 413
  12. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
12 more
  1. 2023Art or Artifice? Large Language Models and the False Promise of Creativitycited by 168
  2. 2019Unifying Human and Statistical Evaluation for Natural Language Generationcited by 127
  3. 2022Pretrained Language Models for Text Generation: A Surveycited by 121
  4. 2019Toward Gender-Inclusive Coreference Resolutioncited by 84
  5. 2021Language Model Evaluation Beyond Perplexitycited by 77
  6. 2023The Next Chapter: A Study of Large Language Models in Storytellingcited by 58
  7. 2016Empath: Understanding Topic Signals in Large-Scale Textcited by 51
  8. 2023What Comes Next? Evaluating Uncertainty in Neural Text Generators Against Human Production Variabilitycited by 51
  9. 2021Uncovering Implicit Gender Bias in Narratives through Commonsense Inferencecited by 32
  10. 2023Experimental Narratives: A Comparison of Human Crowdsourced Storytelling and AI Storytellingcited by 26
  11. 2016Shirtless and Dangerous: Quantifying Linguistic Signals of Gender Bias in an Online Fiction Writing Communitycited by 21
  12. 2022A Moral- and Event- Centric Inspection of Gender Bias in Fairy Tales at A Large Scalecited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

8 papers.