mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Personalized federated learning based on feature fusion

arXiv 2406.16583 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2024cs.LG cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning enables distributed clients to collaborate on training while storing their data locally to protect client privacy. However, due to the heterogeneity of data, models, and devices, the final global model may need to perform better for tasks on each client. Communication bottlenecks, data heterogeneity, and model heterogeneity have been common challenges in federated learning. In this work, we considered a label distribution skew problem, a type of data heterogeneity easily overlooked. In the context of classification, we propose a personalized federated learning approach called pFedPM. In our process, we replace traditional gradient uploading with feature uploading, which helps reduce communication costs and allows for heterogeneous client models. These feature representations play a role in preserving privacy to some extent. We use a hyperparameter a to mix local and global features, which enables us to control the degree of personalization. We also introduced a relation network as an additional decision layer, which provides a non-linear learnable classifier to predict labels. Experimental results show that, with an appropriate setting of a, our scheme outperforms several recent FL methods on MNIST, FEMNIST, and CRIFAR10 datasets and achieves fewer communications.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2024.

Builds on

26 of 32 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  2. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,592
  3. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,021
  4. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,971
  5. 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,461
  6. 2019Class-Balanced Loss Based on Effective Number of Samplescited by 1,239
  7. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,099
  8. 2019Deep Leakage from Gradientscited by 1,004
  9. 2019Learning Imbalanced Datasets with Label-Distribution-Aware Margin Losscited by 987
  10. 2019Decoupling Representation and Classifier for Long-Tailed Recognitioncited by 806
  11. 2018LEAF: A Benchmark for Federated Settingscited by 780
  12. 2020Ensemble Distillation for Robust Model Fusion in Federated Learningcited by 678
14 more
  1. 2021Exploiting Shared Representations for Personalized Federated Learningcited by 537
  2. 2019Federated Learning with Personalization Layerscited by 533
  3. 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 499
  4. 2021Towards Personalized Federated Learningcited by 462
  5. 2021FedProto: Federated Prototype Learning across Heterogeneous Clientscited by 349
  6. 2018Client Selection for Federated Learning with Heterogeneous Resources in Mobile Edgecited by 347
  7. 2019The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 303
  8. 2021No Fear of Heterogeneity: Classifier Calibration for Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 241
  9. 2020Federated Learning of a Mixture of Global and Local Modelscited by 208
  10. 2021FedBABU: Towards Enhanced Representation for Federated Image Classificationcited by 180
  11. 2022Tackling Data Heterogeneity in Federated Learning with Class Prototypescited by 66
  12. 2020Adaptive Federated Dropout: Improving Communication Efficiency and Generalization for Federated Learningcited by 37
  13. 2019On the Discrepancy between the Theoretical Analysis and Practical Implementations of Compressed Communication for Distributed Deep Learningcited by 31
  14. 2020FedCD: Improving Performance in non-IID Federated Learningcited by 13

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.