mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Robust Training Datasets for Machine Learning with Ontologies: A Case Study for Emergency Road Vehicle Detection

arXiv 2406.15268 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2024cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Countless domains rely on Machine Learning (ML) models, including safety-critical domains, such as autonomous driving, which this paper focuses on. While the black box nature of ML is simply a nuisance in some domains, in safety-critical domains, this makes ML models difficult to trust. To fully utilize ML models in safety-critical domains, it would be beneficial to have a method to improve trust in model robustness and accuracy without human experts checking each decision. This research proposes a method to increase trust in ML models used in safety-critical domains by ensuring the robustness and completeness of the model's training dataset. Because ML models embody what they are trained with, ensuring the completeness of training datasets can help to increase the trust in the training of ML models. To this end, this paper proposes the use of a domain ontology and an image quality characteristic ontology to validate the domain completeness and image quality robustness of a training dataset. This research also presents an experiment as a proof of concept for this method, where ontologies are built for the emergency road vehicle domain.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 95 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2024.

Builds on

28 of 95 references.

References · 28

  1. 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,877
  2. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
  3. 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,917
  4. 2016Man is to Computer Programmer as Woman is to Homemaker? Debiasing Word Embeddingscited by 1,312
  5. 2020A Survey on Knowledge Graphs: Representation, Acquisition and Applicationscited by 643
  6. 2020Knowledge Graphscited by 621
  7. 2017Men Also Like Shopping: Reducing Gender Bias Amplification using Corpus-level Constraintscited by 420
  8. 2019A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Towards Medical XAIcited by 404
  9. 2015A Review of Relational Machine Learning for Knowledge Graphscited by 265
  10. 2020A Survey on the Explainability of Supervised Machine Learningcited by 227
  11. 2021Machine Learning with a Reject Option: A surveycited by 109
  12. 2017A Study and Comparison of Human and Deep Learning Recognition Performance Under Visual Distortionscited by 108
16 more
  1. 2021Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to do?cited by 93
  2. 2016Examining the Impact of Blur on Recognition by Convolutional Networkscited by 58
  3. 2020Compositional Convolutional Neural Networks: A Deep Architecture with Innate Robustness to Partial Occlusioncited by 47
  4. 2022The State of the Art in Enhancing Trust in Machine Learning Models with the Use of Visualizationscited by 29
  5. 2017An Analysis of ISO 26262: Using Machine Learning Safely in Automotive Softwarecited by 26
  6. 2021The Role of Explainability in Assuring Safety of Machine Learning in Healthcarecited by 26
  7. 2019Tutorial: Safe and Reliable Machine Learningcited by 22
  8. 2020SafeML: Safety Monitoring of Machine Learning Classifiers through Statistical Difference Measurecited by 16
  9. 2019Practical Solutions for Machine Learning Safety in Autonomous Vehiclescited by 15
  10. 2017Quality Resilient Deep Neural Networkscited by 12
  11. 2020IEEE 7010: A New Standard for Assessing the Well-being Implications of Artificial Intelligencecited by 11
  12. 2018Combinatorial Testing for Deep Learning Systemscited by 8
  13. 2019Understanding Bias in Machine Learningcited by 8
  14. 2019Infusing domain knowledge in AI-based "black box" models for better explainability with application in bankruptcy predictioncited by 6
  15. 2019Towards Safe Machine Learning for CPS: Infer Uncertainty from Training Datacited by 5
  16. 2020Semantic Modeling with SUMOcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.