mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

ACR: A Benchmark for Automatic Cohort Retrieval

arXiv 2406.14780 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2024cs.AIcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Identifying patient cohorts is fundamental to numerous healthcare tasks, including clinical trial recruitment and retrospective studies. Current cohort retrieval methods in healthcare organizations rely on automated queries of structured data combined with manual curation, which are time-consuming, labor-intensive, and often yield low-quality results. Recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) and information retrieval (IR) offer promising avenues to revolutionize these systems. Major challenges include managing extensive eligibility criteria and handling the longitudinal nature of unstructured Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) while ensuring that the solution remains cost-effective for real-world application. This paper introduces a new task, Automatic Cohort Retrieval (ACR), and evaluates the performance of LLMs and commercial, domain-specific neuro-symbolic approaches. We provide a benchmark task, a query dataset, an EMR dataset, and an evaluation framework. Our findings underscore the necessity for efficient, high-quality ACR systems capable of longitudinal reasoning across extensive patient databases.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2024.

Builds on

25 of 65 references.

References · 25

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2021RoFormer: Enhanced Transformer with Rotary Position Embeddingcited by 4,581
  3. 2022Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledgecited by 1,807
  4. 2020MPNet: Masked and Permuted Pre-training for Language Understandingcited by 973
  5. 2023YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Modelscited by 584
  6. 2023Large Language Models for Information Retrieval: A Surveycited by 331
  7. 2023A Survey of Large Language Models for Healthcare: from Data, Technology, and Applications to Accountability and Ethicscited by 162
  8. 2023Matching Patients to Clinical Trials with Large Language Modelscited by 68
  9. 2023Scaling Clinical Trial Matching Using Large Language Models: A Case Study in Oncologycited by 24
  10. 2023Distilling Large Language Models for Matching Patients to Clinical Trialscited by 16
  11. 2020Understanding Clinical Trial Reports: Extracting Medical Entities and Their Relationscited by 14
  12. 2021A Scoping Review of Publicly Available Language Tasks in Clinical Natural Language Processingcited by 10
13 more
  1. 2022The Leaf Clinical Trials Corpus: a new resource for query generation from clinical trial eligibility criteriacited by 9
  2. 2023Effective Matching of Patients to Clinical Trials using Entity Extraction and Neural Re-rankingcited by 8
  3. 2020Patient Cohort Retrieval using Transformer Language Modelscited by 7
  4. 2020Attention-Based LSTM Network for COVID-19 Clinical Trial Parsingcited by 5
  5. 2019CREATE: Cohort Retrieval Enhanced by Analysis of Text from Electronic Health Records using OMOP Common Data Modelcited by 4
  6. 2020Model-assisted cohort selection with bias analysis for generating large-scale cohorts from the EHR for oncology researchcited by 4
  7. 2023Towards Fair Patient-Trial Matching via Patient-Criterion Level Fairness Constraintcited by 4
  8. 2023Clinical Trial Recommendations Using Semantics-Based Inductive Inference and Knowledge Graph Embeddingscited by 4
  9. 2020Fair and Useful Cohort Selectioncited by 3
  10. 2022Leximax Approximations and Representative Cohort Selectioncited by 3
  11. 2023TREEMENT: Interpretable Patient-Trial Matching via Personalized Dynamic Tree-Based Memory Networkcited by 2
  12. 2017Health Analytics: a systematic review of approaches to detect phenotype cohorts using electronic health recordscited by 1
  13. 2023Coupling Symbolic Reasoning with Language Modeling for Efficient Longitudinal Understanding of Unstructured Electronic Medical Recordscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.