mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Effective Matching of Patients to Clinical Trials using Entity Extraction and Neural Re-ranking

arXiv 2307.00381 ↗First posted 1 Jul 2023cs.IR cs.CLcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinical trials (CTs) often fail due to inadequate patient recruitment. This paper tackles the challenges of CT retrieval by presenting an approach that addresses the patient-to-trials paradigm. Our approach involves two key components in a pipeline-based model: (i) a data enrichment technique for enhancing both queries and documents during the first retrieval stage, and (ii) a novel re-ranking schema that uses a Transformer network in a setup adapted to this task by leveraging the structure of the CT documents. We use named entity recognition and negation detection in both patient description and the eligibility section of CTs. We further classify patient descriptions and CT eligibility criteria into current, past, and family medical conditions. This extracted information is used to boost the importance of disease and drug mentions in both query and index for lexical retrieval. Furthermore, we propose a two-step training schema for the Transformer network used to re-rank the results from the lexical retrieval. The first step focuses on matching patient information with the descriptive sections of trials, while the second step aims to determine eligibility by matching patient information with the criteria section. Our findings indicate that the inclusion criteria section of the CT has a great influence on the relevance score in lexical models, and that the enrichment techniques for queries and documents improve the retrieval of relevant trials. The re-ranking strategy, based on our training schema, consistently enhances CT retrieval and shows improved performance by 15% in terms of precision at retrieving eligible trials. The results of our experiments suggest the benefit of making use of extracted entities. Moreover, our proposed re-ranking schema shows promising effectiveness compared to larger neural models, even with limited training data.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 43 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2023.

Builds on

7 of 43 references.

References · 7

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  2. 2019ScispaCy: Fast and Robust Models for Biomedical Natural Language Processingcited by 244
  3. 2021Launching into clinical space with medspaCy: a new clinical text processing toolkit in Pythoncited by 40
  4. 2022Curriculum Learning for Dense Retrieval Distillationcited by 38
  5. 2019Natural Language Processing of Clinical Notes on Chronic Diseases: Systematic Reviewcited by 36
  6. 2022Trial2Vec: Zero-Shot Clinical Trial Document Similarity Search using Self-Supervisioncited by 18
  7. 2022Automation of Citation Screening for Systematic Literature Reviews using Neural Networks: A Replicability Studycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 5.

8 papers.