Towards Fair Patient-Trial Matching via Patient-Criterion Level Fairness Constraint
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Clinical trials are indispensable in developing new treatments, but they face obstacles in patient recruitment and retention, hindering the enrollment of necessary participants. To tackle these challenges, deep learning frameworks have been created to match patients to trials. These frameworks calculate the similarity between patients and clinical trial eligibility criteria, considering the discrepancy between inclusion and exclusion criteria. Recent studies have shown that these frameworks outperform earlier approaches. However, deep learning models may raise fairness issues in patient-trial matching when certain sensitive groups of individuals are underrepresented in clinical trials, leading to incomplete or inaccurate data and potential harm. To tackle the issue of fairness, this work proposes a fair patient-trial matching framework by generating a patient-criterion level fairness constraint. The proposed framework considers the inconsistency between the embedding of inclusion and exclusion criteria among patients of different sensitive groups. The experimental results on real-world patient-trial and patient-criterion matching tasks demonstrate that the proposed framework can successfully alleviate the predictions that tend to be biased.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Mar 2023.
Builds on
19 of 35 references.
References · 19
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,603
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2019Publicly Available Clinical BERT Embeddingscited by 995
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 802
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2014Memory Networkscited by 354
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2015Highway Networkscited by 257
- 2017Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophycited by 148
7 more
- 2019Wasserstein Fair Classificationcited by 131
- 2019Fairness in Recommendation Ranking through Pairwise Comparisonscited by 127
- 201850 Years of Test (Un)fairness: Lessons for Machine Learningcited by 101
- 2015Convolutional Neural Network Architectures for Matching Natural Language Sentencescited by 82
- 2019Putting Fairness Principles into Practice: Challenges, Metrics, and Improvementscited by 70
- 2020COMPOSE: Cross-Modal Pseudo-Siamese Network for Patient Trial Matchingcited by 37
- 2023Fairly Predicting Graft Failure in Liver Transplant for Organ Assigningcited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 3; 2024: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Multi-Task Learning for Post-transplant Cause of Death Analysis: A Case Study on Liver Transplantcited by 2
- 2024ACR: A Benchmark for Automatic Cohort Retrievalcited by 2
- 2023TVE: Learning Meta-attribution for Transferable Vision Explainercited by 1
- 2023Beyond Fairness: Age-Harmless Parkinson's Detection via Voicecited by 0
- 2024ACR: A Benchmark for Automatic Cohort Retrieval20 Jun 2024
- 2023TVE: Learning Meta-attribution for Transferable Vision Explainer23 Dec 2023
- 2023Beyond Fairness: Age-Harmless Parkinson's Detection via Voice23 Sep 2023
- 2023Multi-Task Learning for Post-transplant Cause of Death Analysis: A Case Study on Liver Transplant30 Mar 2023