mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The neural correlates of logical-mathematical symbol systems processing resemble that of spatial cognition more than natural language processing

arXiv 2406.14358 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2024q-bio.NC cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The ability to manipulate logical-mathematical symbols (LMS), encompassing tasks such as calculation, reasoning, and programming, is a cognitive skill arguably unique to humans. Considering the relatively recent emergence of this ability in human evolutionary history, it has been suggested that LMS processing may build upon more fundamental cognitive systems, possibly through neuronal recycling. Previous studies have pinpointed two primary candidates, natural language processing and spatial cognition. Existing comparisons between these domains largely relied on task-level comparison, which may be confounded by task idiosyncrasy. The present study instead compared the neural correlates at the domain level with both automated meta-analysis and synthesized maps based on three representative LMS tasks, reasoning, calculation, and mental programming. Our results revealed a more substantial cortical overlap between LMS processing and spatial cognition, in contrast to language processing. Furthermore, in regions activated by both spatial and language processing, the multivariate activation pattern for LMS processing exhibited greater multivariate similarity to spatial cognition than to language processing. A hierarchical clustering analysis further indicated that typical LMS tasks were indistinguishable from spatial cognition tasks at the neural level, suggesting an inherent connection between these two cognitive processes. Taken together, our findings support the hypothesis that spatial cognition is likely the basis of LMS processing, which may shed light on the limitations of large language models in logical reasoning, particularly those trained exclusively on textual data without explicit emphasis on spatial content.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2024.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025On Representational Dissociation of Language and Arithmetic in Large Language Models
  2. 2026From Human Cognition to Neural Activations: Probing the Computational Primitives of Spatial Reasoning in LLMs
  3. 2025Large Language Models Show Signs of Alignment with Human Neurocognition During Abstract Reasoning
  4. 2026Abstract representational geometry supports inference in large language models
  5. 2025Three tiers of computation in transformers and in brain architectures
  6. 2024The LLM Language Network: A Neuroscientific Approach for Identifying Causally Task-Relevant Units
  7. 2025Beyond Pattern Recognition: Probing Mental Representations of LMs
  8. 2025Towards a Neurosymbolic Reasoning System Grounded in Schematic Representations