mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DetectBench: Can Large Language Model Detect and Piece Together Implicit Evidence?

arXiv 2406.12641 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Detecting evidence within the context is a key step in the process of reasoning task. Evaluating and enhancing the capabilities of LLMs in evidence detection will strengthen context-based reasoning performance. This paper proposes a benchmark called DetectBench for verifying the ability to detect and piece together implicit evidence within a long context. DetectBench contains 3,928 multiple-choice questions, with an average of 994 tokens per question. Each question contains an average of 4.55 pieces of implicit evidence, and solving the problem typically requires 7.62 logical jumps to find the correct answer. To enhance the performance of LLMs in evidence detection, this paper proposes Detective Reasoning Prompt and Finetune. Experiments demonstrate that the existing LLMs' abilities to detect evidence in long contexts are far inferior to humans. However, the Detective Reasoning Prompt effectively enhances the capability of powerful LLMs in evidence detection, while the Finetuning method shows significant effects in enhancing the performance of weaker LLMs. Moreover, when the abilities of LLMs in evidence detection are improved, their final reasoning performance is also enhanced accordingly.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.

Builds on

26 of 42 references.

References · 26

  1. 2023LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Modelscited by 13,958
  2. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  3. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  4. 2022Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Reasonerscited by 4,323
  5. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  6. 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
  7. 2018HotpotQA: A Dataset for Diverse, Explainable Multi-hop Question Answeringcited by 3,686
  8. 2023LongBench: A Bilingual, Multitask Benchmark for Long Context Understandingcited by 1,378
  9. 2018FEVER: a large-scale dataset for Fact Extraction and VERificationcited by 1,362
  10. 2023WizardLM: Empowering large pre-trained language models to follow complex instructionscited by 1,116
  11. 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,080
  12. 2021Did Aristotle Use a Laptop? A Question Answering Benchmark with Implicit Reasoning Strategiescited by 736
14 more
  1. 2022Complexity-Based Prompting for Multi-Step Reasoningcited by 387
  2. 2023Benchmarking Large Language Models in Retrieval-Augmented Generationcited by 307
  3. 2019Abductive Commonsense Reasoningcited by 300
  4. 2022Unified Structure Generation for Universal Information Extractioncited by 220
  5. 2020ReClor: A Reading Comprehension Dataset Requiring Logical Reasoningcited by 211
  6. 2021FEVEROUS: Fact Extraction and VERification Over Unstructured and Structured informationcited by 166
  7. 2021TopiOCQA: Open-domain Conversational Question Answering with Topic Switchingcited by 95
  8. 2023Xiezhi: An Ever-Updating Benchmark for Holistic Domain Knowledge Evaluationcited by 52
  9. 2023Benchmarks for Automated Commonsense Reasoning: A Surveycited by 40
  10. 2021Database Reasoning Over Textcited by 20
  11. 2023UNcommonsense Reasoning: Abductive Reasoning about Uncommon Situationscited by 19
  12. 2021UQuAD1.0: Development of an Urdu Question Answering Training Data for Machine Reading Comprehensioncited by 6
  13. 2022Contextual embedding and model weighting by fusing domain knowledge on Biomedical Question Answeringcited by 4
  14. 2022Harnessing Knowledge and Reasoning for Human-Like Natural Language Generation: A Brief Reviewcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

4 papers.