Exploring the Impact of a Transformer's Latent Space Geometry on Downstream Task Performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is generally thought that transformer-based large language models benefit from pre-training by learning generic linguistic knowledge that can be focused on a specific task during fine-tuning. However, we propose that much of the benefit from pre-training may be captured by geometric characteristics of the latent space representations, divorced from any specific linguistic knowledge. In this work we explore the relationship between GLUE benchmarking task performance and a variety of measures applied to the latent space resulting from BERT-type contextual language models. We find that there is a strong linear relationship between a measure of quantized cell density and average GLUE performance and that these measures may be predictive of otherwise surprising GLUE performance for several non-standard BERT-type models from the literature. These results may be suggestive of a strategy for decreasing pre-training requirements, wherein model initialization can be informed by the geometric characteristics of the model's latent space.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2024.
Builds on
23 of 44 references.
References · 23
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2019Representation Degeneration Problem in Training Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 255
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 212
- 2019Deconstructing Lottery Tickets: Zeros, Signs, and the Supermaskcited by 207
- 2015Semi-supervised Sequence Learningcited by 198
- 2021Masked Language Modeling and the Distributional Hypothesis: Order Word Matters Pre-training for Littlecited by 177
- 2018Spreading vectors for similarity searchcited by 118
- 2020What Happens To BERT Embeddings During Fine-tuning?cited by 113
11 more
- 2023The geometry of hidden representations of large transformer modelscited by 112
- 2021IsoScore: Measuring the Uniformity of Embedding Space Utilizationcited by 53
- 2018FRAGE: Frequency-Agnostic Word Representationcited by 47
- 2021A Cluster-based Approach for Improving Isotropy in Contextual Embedding Spacecited by 27
- 2021Learning to Remove: Towards Isotropic Pre-trained BERT Embeddingcited by 23
- 2022How does the pre-training objective affect what large language models learn about linguistic properties?cited by 16
- 2021Low Anisotropy Sense Retrofitting (LASeR) : Towards Isotropic and Sense Enriched Representationscited by 13
- 2020Autoencoding Improves Pre-trained Word Embeddingscited by 11
- 2020Embedding Compression with Isotropic Iterative Quantizationcited by 10
- 2022Reliable Measures of Spread in High Dimensional Latent Spacescited by 5
- 2022Empirical Evaluation of Post-Training Quantization Methods for Language Taskscited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Representational Capacity: Geometric Limits on Feature Representation in Transformer Language Models
- 2026The Interlingua Hypothesis: LLMs Translate via a Latent Task-agnostic Feature Space
- 2024Does Representation Matter? Exploring Intermediate Layers in Large Language Models
- 2024Separating Tongue from Thought: Activation Patching Reveals Language-Agnostic Concept Representations in Transformers
- 2025Latent Concept Disentanglement in Transformer-based Language Models
- 2024Talking Heads: Understanding Inter-layer Communication in Transformer Language Models
- 2026A Geometric Perspective on Next-Token Prediction in Large Language Models: Three Emerging Phases
- 2022minicons: Enabling Flexible Behavioral and Representational Analyses of Transformer Language Models