Reliable Measures of Spread in High Dimensional Latent Spaces
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Understanding geometric properties of natural language processing models' latent spaces allows the manipulation of these properties for improved performance on downstream tasks. One such property is the amount of data spread in a model's latent space, or how fully the available latent space is being used. In this work, we define data spread and demonstrate that the commonly used measures of data spread, Average Cosine Similarity and a partition function min/max ratio I(V), do not provide reliable metrics to compare the use of latent space across models. We propose and examine eight alternative measures of data spread, all but one of which improve over these current metrics when applied to seven synthetic data distributions. Of our proposed measures, we recommend one principal component-based measure and one entropy-based measure that provide reliable, relative measures of spread and can be used to compare models of different sizes and dimensionalities.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Dec 2022.
Builds on
19 of 42 references.
References · 19
- 2013Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionalitycited by 3,474
- 2017Billion-scale similarity search with GPUscited by 2,497
- 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
- 2016Tutorial on Variational Autoencoderscited by 409
- 2019Representation Degeneration Problem in Training Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 255
- 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 212
- 2018Spreading vectors for similarity searchcited by 118
- 2018Learning towards Minimum Hyperspherical Energycited by 75
- 2018FRAGE: Frequency-Agnostic Word Representationcited by 47
- 2018On the Dimensionality of Word Embeddingcited by 46
- 2019Word Embeddings: A Surveycited by 45
- 2021Learning to Remove: Towards Isotropic Pre-trained BERT Embeddingcited by 23
7 more
- 2021How Does Fine-tuning Affect the Geometry of Embedding Space: A Case Study on Isotropycited by 23
- 2021Low Anisotropy Sense Retrofitting (LASeR) : Towards Isotropic and Sense Enriched Representationscited by 13
- 2020IsoBN: Fine-Tuning BERT with Isotropic Batch Normalizationcited by 12
- 2020Autoencoding Improves Pre-trained Word Embeddingscited by 11
- 2020Embedding Compression with Isotropic Iterative Quantizationcited by 10
- 2015A Latent Variable Model Approach to PMI-based Word Embeddingscited by 7
- 2019Latent Space Cartography: Generalised Metric-Inspired Measures and Measure-Based Transformations for Generative Modelscited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
5 papers.
- 2025Spectral Scaling Laws in Language Models: How Effectively Do Feed-Forward Networks Use Their Latent Space?cited by 8
- 2026NerVE: Nonlinear Eigenspectrum Dynamics in LLM Feed-Forward Networkscited by 3
- 2024Exploring the Impact of a Transformer's Latent Space Geometry on Downstream Task Performancecited by 1
- 2025Keep your distance: learning dispersed embeddings on mathbbSmcited by 1
- 2026EVA: Towards a universal model of the immune systemcited by 0
- 2026NerVE: Nonlinear Eigenspectrum Dynamics in LLM Feed-Forward Networks6 Mar 2026
- 2026EVA: Towards a universal model of the immune system10 Feb 2026
- 2025Spectral Scaling Laws in Language Models: How Effectively Do Feed-Forward Networks Use Their Latent Space?1 Oct 2025
- 2025Keep your distance: learning dispersed embeddings on mathbbSm12 Feb 2025
- 2024Exploring the Impact of a Transformer's Latent Space Geometry on Downstream Task Performance18 Jun 2024