mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Understanding the Shape of Representations in Protein Language Models

arXiv 2509.24895 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2025cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

While protein language models (PLMs) are one of the most promising avenues of research for future de novo protein design, the way in which they transform sequences to hidden representations, as well as the information encoded in such representations is yet to be fully understood. Several works have attempted to propose interpretability tools for PLMs, but they have focused on understanding how individual sequences are transformed by such models. Therefore, the way in which PLMs transform the whole space of sequences along with their relations is still unknown. In this work we attempt to understand this transformed space of sequences by identifying protein structure and representation with square-root velocity (SRV) representations and graph filtrations. Both approaches naturally lead to a metric space in which pairs of proteins or protein representations can be compared with each other. We analyze different types of proteins from the SCOP dataset and show that the Karcher mean and effective dimension of the SRV shape space follow a non-linear pattern as a function of the layers in ESM2 models of different sizes. Furthermore, we use graph filtrations as a tool to study the context lengths at which models encode the structural features of proteins. We find that PLMs preferentially encode immediate as well as local relations between residues, but start to degrade for larger context lengths. The most structurally faithful encoding tends to occur close to, but before the last layer of the models, indicating that training a folding model ontop of these layers might lead to improved folding performance.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2025.

Builds on

12 of 36 references.

References · 12

  1. 2020Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuningcited by 671
  2. 2020SE(3)-Transformers: 3D Roto-Translation Equivariant Attention Networkscited by 607
  3. 2018Measuring the Intrinsic Dimension of Objective Landscapescited by 370
  4. 2023The geometry of hidden representations of large transformer modelscited by 112
  5. 2018geomstats: a Python Package for Riemannian Geometry in Machine Learningcited by 71
  6. 2019Graph Filtration Learningcited by 69
  7. 2024InterPLM: Discovering Interpretable Features in Protein Language Models via Sparse Autoencoderscited by 66
  8. 2024Emergence of a High-Dimensional Abstraction Phase in Language Transformerscited by 56
  9. 2021IsoScore: Measuring the Uniformity of Embedding Space Utilizationcited by 53
  10. 2023Ankh: Optimized Protein Language Model Unlocks General-Purpose Modellingcited by 45
  11. 2021G-VAE, a Geometric Convolutional VAE for ProteinStructure Generationcited by 2
  12. 2024Exploring the Impact of a Transformer's Latent Space Geometry on Downstream Task Performancecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.