mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Reconsidering Sentence-Level Sign Language Translation

arXiv 2406.11049 ↗First posted 16 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Historically, sign language machine translation has been posed as a sentence-level task: datasets consisting of continuous narratives are chopped up and presented to the model as isolated clips. In this work, we explore the limitations of this task framing. First, we survey a number of linguistic phenomena in sign languages that depend on discourse-level context. Then as a case study, we perform the first human baseline for sign language translation that actually substitutes a human into the machine learning task framing, rather than provide the human with the entire document as context. This human baseline -- for ASL to English translation on the How2Sign dataset -- shows that for 33% of sentences in our sample, our fluent Deaf signer annotators were only able to understand key parts of the clip in light of additional discourse-level context. These results underscore the importance of understanding and sanity checking examples when adapting machine learning to new domains.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 81 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2024.

Builds on

27 of 81 references.

References · 27

  1. 2018A Call for Clarity in Reporting BLEU Scorescited by 1,790
  2. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,196
  3. 2019Word-level Deep Sign Language Recognition from Video: A New Large-scale Dataset and Methods Comparisoncited by 217
  4. 2020How2Sign: A Large-scale Multimodal Dataset for Continuous American Sign Languagecited by 172
  5. 2018How2: A Large-scale Dataset for Multimodal Language Understandingcited by 137
  6. 2018MS-ASL: A Large-Scale Data Set and Benchmark for Understanding American Sign Languagecited by 118
  7. 2021Gender Bias in Machine Translationcited by 116
  8. 2021Learning Compact Metrics for MTcited by 93
  9. 2023Document-Level Machine Translation with Large Language Modelscited by 90
  10. 2018Has Machine Translation Achieved Human Parity? A Case for Document-level Evaluationcited by 88
  11. 2017Evaluating Discourse Phenomena in Neural Machine Translationcited by 87
  12. 2019Sign Language Recognition, Generation, and Translation: An Interdisciplinary Perspectivecited by 87
15 more
  1. 2023YouTube-ASL: A Large-Scale, Open-Domain American Sign Language-English Parallel Corpuscited by 74
  2. 2022Open-Domain Sign Language Translation Learned from Online Videocited by 72
  3. 2021Including Signed Languages in Natural Language Processingcited by 67
  4. 2020Leveraging Monolingual Data with Self-Supervision for Multilingual Neural Machine Translationcited by 51
  5. 2021Designing Disaggregated Evaluations of AI Systems: Choices, Considerations, and Tradeoffscited by 48
  6. 2023Sign Language Translation from Instructional Videoscited by 39
  7. 2021When Does Translation Require Context? A Data-driven, Multilingual Explorationcited by 36
  8. 2021Content4All Open Research Sign Language Translation Datasetscited by 30
  9. 2019Fingerspelling recognition in the wild with iterative visual attentioncited by 28
  10. 2022Considerations for meaningful sign language machine translation based on glossescited by 24
  11. 2018American Sign Language fingerspelling recognition in the wildcited by 20
  12. 2022Deconstructing Distributions: A Pointwise Framework of Learningcited by 19
  13. 2024Systemic Biases in Sign Language AI Research: A Deaf-Led Call to Reevaluate Research Agendascited by 19
  14. 2023JWSign: A Highly Multilingual Corpus of Bible Translations for more Diversity in Sign Language Processingcited by 18
  15. 2023Is context all you need? Scaling Neural Sign Language Translation to Large Domains of Discoursecited by 15

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.

4 papers.