mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Facts-and-Feelings: Capturing both Objectivity and Subjectivity in Table-to-Text Generation

arXiv 2406.10560 ↗First posted 15 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Table-to-text generation, a long-standing challenge in natural language generation, has remained unexplored through the lens of subjectivity. Subjectivity here encompasses the comprehension of information derived from the table that cannot be described solely by objective data. Given the absence of pre-existing datasets, we introduce the Ta2TS dataset with 3849 data instances. We perform the task of fine-tuning sequence-to-sequence models on the linearized tables and prompting on popular large language models. We analyze the results from a quantitative and qualitative perspective to ensure the capture of subjectivity and factual consistency. The analysis shows the fine-tuned LMs can perform close to the prompted LLMs. Both the models can capture the tabular data, generating texts with 85.15% BERTScore and 26.28% Meteor score. To the best of our knowledge, we provide the first-of-its-kind dataset on tables with multiple genres and subjectivity included and present the first comprehensive analysis and comparison of different LLM performances on this task.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Jun 2024.

Builds on

13 of 24 references.

References · 13

  1. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,491
  2. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,462
  3. 2020ToTTo: A Controlled Table-To-Text Generation Datasetcited by 267
  4. 2017Challenges in Data-to-Document Generationcited by 226
  5. 2019Handling Divergent Reference Texts when Evaluating Table-to-Text Generationcited by 119
  6. 2018Data-to-Text Generation with Content Selection and Planningcited by 106
  7. 2020Text-to-Text Pre-Training for Data-to-Text Taskscited by 104
  8. 2021Controlling Hallucinations at Word Level in Data-to-Text Generationcited by 41
  9. 2021Data-to-text Generation with Macro Planningcited by 34
  10. 2022Robust (Controlled) Table-to-Text Generation with Structure-Aware Equivariance Learningcited by 32
  11. 2020WikiTableT: A Large-Scale Data-to-Text Dataset for Generating Wikipedia Article Sectionscited by 22
  12. 2019A Hierarchical Model for Data-to-Text Generationcited by 20
1 more
  1. 2023Assessing the nature of large language models: A caution against anthropocentrismcited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.