mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SciEx: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Scientific Exams with Human Expert Grading and Automatic Grading

arXiv 2406.10421 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2024cs.CLcited by 14

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), it is crucial to have benchmarks which can evaluate the ability of LLMs on different domains. One common use of LLMs is performing tasks on scientific topics, such as writing algorithms, querying databases or giving mathematical proofs. Inspired by the way university students are evaluated on such tasks, in this paper, we propose SciEx - a benchmark consisting of university computer science exam questions, to evaluate LLMs ability on solving scientific tasks. SciEx is (1) multilingual, containing both English and German exams, and (2) multi-modal, containing questions that involve images, and (3) contains various types of freeform questions with different difficulty levels, due to the nature of university exams. We evaluate the performance of various state-of-the-art LLMs on our new benchmark. Since SciEx questions are freeform, it is not straightforward to evaluate LLM performance. Therefore, we provide human expert grading of the LLM outputs on SciEx. We show that the free-form exams in SciEx remain challenging for the current LLMs, where the best LLM only achieves 59.4% exam grade on average. We also provide detailed comparisons between LLM performance and student performance on SciEx. To enable future evaluation of new LLMs, we propose using LLM-as-a-judge to grade the LLM answers on SciEx. Our experiments show that, although they do not perform perfectly on solving the exams, LLMs are decent as graders, achieving 0.948 Pearson correlation with expert grading.

Key facts. Cited by 14 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2024.

Builds on

13 of 29 references.

References · 13

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  2. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  3. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  4. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  5. 2022Learn to Explain: Multimodal Reasoning via Thought Chains for Science Question Answeringcited by 1,919
  6. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  7. 2017Crowdsourcing Multiple Choice Science Questionscited by 765
  8. 2023Can Large Language Models Be an Alternative to Human Evaluations?cited by 734
  9. 2021BARTScore: Evaluating Generated Text as Text Generationcited by 722
  10. 2021A Dataset of Information-Seeking Questions and Answers Anchored in Research Paperscited by 486
  11. 2024MLLM-as-a-Judge: Assessing Multimodal LLM-as-a-Judge with Vision-Language Benchmarkcited by 372
  12. 2023Conversational Health Agents: A Personalized LLM-Powered Agent Frameworkcited by 92
1 more
  1. 2021Think you have Solved Direct-Answer Question Answering? Try ARC-DA, the Direct-Answer AI2 Reasoning Challengecited by 80

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 8; 2026: 6.

14 papers.

Sort:

By area: